SIMIAN VIRUS 40 (SV40)

Table of contents :


  • Epidemiology
  • Genomics
  • Proteomics
  • Transmission
  • Symptoms & signs
  • Laboratory examinations


  •  
    Epidemiology : prevalence of serum antibodies = 3.8% (< 5% in any age group). SV40 seroprevalence rates in the general populations of the USA and other countries have ranged from 2 to 20%ref1, ref2. However, differences in the methodology and low sensitivity of the assays used in some studies make it difficult to ascertain the actual prevalence of SV40 infections. A report by Shah et al.ref found that 18% of adult kidney transplant patients had specific neutralizing antibody to SV40. Another study among adult patients showed the presence of SV40 neutralizing antibodies in 16% of HIV-infected patients and 11% of individuals not infected with HIVref. Among hospitalized children, the overall prevalence of specific SV40 serum neutralizing antibodies was 6%ref; the SV40 seropositivity among children increased with age (P = 0.01) and was significantly associated with kidney transplantation (P < 0.001). Recently, a study of the prevalence of SV40 infections showed rates of 9% in Hungary and 4% in the Czech Republicref. Females had a higher rate of SV40 antibodies than males, reaching 16% in Hungary and 8% in the Czech Republic in certain age groups. SV40 infections were found in similar proportions in both countries among persons not exposed to potentially contaminated polio vaccines and in subjects vaccinated in the era of SV40-free vaccines. Minor et al.ref recently analyzed over 2,000 sera from the United Kingdom and found an SV40 seroprevalence rate of just under 5%. Most of the neutralizing titers were low, and there was no apparent relationship between antibody positivity and polio vaccine usage. These data suggest that SV40 is being transmitted in the human population today, probably at a relatively low prevalence rate. However, conclusions about seroprevalence rates should be viewed with caution, as very little is known about the human immune response to SV40 infections. Molecular studies of adult patients with renal disease and recipients of kidney transplants found that SV40 cytopathic effects developed in CV-1 cells cocultured with urinary cells or PBMCs from those patientsref1, ref2. SV40 sequences were detected by PCR in kidney biopsies from 56% of patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) (found also in brain and urine)ref1, ref2. SV40 DNA was localized to renal tubular epithelial cell nuclei in renal biopsies of patients with FSGS as determined by in situ hybridization. In addition, studies showed that SV40 DNA sequences from the viral regulatory region were detected and identified in the allografts of immunocompromised pediatric renal transplants recipientsref1, ref2 and in the native kidney of a young adult lung transplant patient with polyomavirus nephropathyref. Different studies have detected SV40 DNA sequences in PBMCs from various patient populationsref1, ref2, ref3, ref4, ref5, ref6. These results demonstrate the nephrotropic and lymphotropic properties of SV40 and indicate that the kidney can serve as a reservoir for the virus in humans. It appears that patients with acquired and/or iatrogenic immunosuppression are a population at risk for SV40. However, the frequency, natural history, and morbidity of the virus in this increasing patient population are unclear. Large prospective studies using sensitive and specific reagents for SV40 are needed to determine the prevalence of viral infections in the general population and to define groups of individuals at elevated risk for this emerging pathogen. Similarly important is the need for prospective longitudinal studies that address the morbidity and related mortality of these infections. The use of serologic tests alone may not be the most reliable way to conduct these studies. An enzyme immunoassay method for detection of SV40 antibodies in humans recognizes cross-reactivity between SV40, BKV, and JCV, complicating interpretation of assay resultsref. Similar limitations have been found in serologic methods for identification of human infection with herpes B virus (Cercopithecine herpesvirus 1), which is known also to naturally infect rhesus macaques (M. mulatta)ref. Because infection with B virus in humans results in fatal encephalomyelitis or severe neurologic impairment, rapid and conclusive diagnosis is critical in order to control sequelae by this viral pathogen. Serologic assays (including enzyme immunoassay) for B-virus infection in humans are limited by low sensitivity and specificityref. Currently, cell culture for the 3 polyomaviruses known to infect humans (JCV, BKV, and SV40) is rarely helpful in establishing diagnosis of infection because of slow viral growth and the requirement for specialized cell linesref. Serologic assays may be useful for retrospective epidemiological analysis, but they are of minimal use for diagnosis or therapeutic decisions because most overt polyomavirus infections are believed to result from reactivation of latent infectionsref. Therefore, the use of modern molecular biology assays is an excellent and preferred alternative for the analysis of SV40 infections in the human populationref. In addition, these sensitive and specific techniques are able to provide insights into the possible infectious etiology of human malignanciesref1, ref2, ref3. Timeline : Genomics : SV40 shares 70% homology with JCV and BKV. Although these viruses are related, they can be distinguished easily at the DNA and protein levels. Genetic differences, particularly in the noncoding, regulatory regions of the viral genomes, may determine important differences in host range. Furthermore, the 3 viruses can be differentiated serologically by neutralization and hemagglutination assaysref. The circular SV40 DNA genome is represented, with the unique EcoRI site shown at map unit 100/0. Nucleotide numbers based on reference strain SV40-776 begin and end at the origin (Ori) of viral DNA replication (map unit 0/5243). The ORFs that encode viral proteins are indicated. The early T-ag proteins are shown on the right, and the late structural (VP) proteins are shown on the left. The beginning and end of each open reading frame are indicated by nucleotide numbersref

    It integrates into adenovirus/SV40 integration site 1 (ASVS1) : Proteomics : the SV40 genome is divided into : There is only one known serotype of SV40, but genetic strains exist and can be distinguished by nucleotide differences in the regulatory regionref and in the variable domain at the extreme C terminus of T-ag, which is defined as the last 86 amino acids of the molecule (residues 622 to 708)ref1, ref2, ref3, ref4, ref5, ref6, ref7. Nucleotide differences in the T-ag C-terminal region, including polynucleotide insertions and deletions as well as single nucleotide changes, would change some encoded amino acids. These distinctions at the nucleotide and protein levels have conclusively established that SV40 sequences in human malignancies and other clinical samples are not the result of accidental laboratory contamination. However, future studies need to determine whether SV40 strains differ in pathogenic and/or oncogenic capacity. The classic example of DNA virus strains differing in oncogenic capacity is the HPV group; of the > 75 types described, of which about 30 cause genital infections, only a few types are associated with the development of cervical carcinomaref. This identification of high-risk strains has led to the development of preventive interventions, such as the vaccine against HPV type 16ref.
    Laboratory-adapted monkey strains of SV40 typically contain 2 72-bp enhancer elements; these are designated "nonarchetypal" or complex regulatory structuresref. In contrast, SV40 isolates from human nonmalignant and malignant specimens usually (but not always) contain no duplications in the enhancer ("archetypal" structure). DNA sequence profiles of SV40 regulatory regions detected in human kidney transplant recipients. Ori, viral origin of DNA replication region, which spans nucleotides 5195 to 31; 21-bp repeats, GC-rich region between nucleotides 40 and 103; 72, 72-bp sequence within the enhancer region that is duplicated in some monkey strains (e.g., reference strain SV40-776). Nucleotide numbers are based on SV40-776. Shown are viral sequences associated with transplanted human kidneys (clone designations are on the right). Polymorphisms at the indicated residues are indicated above the boxesref. For a detailed description of the SV40 regulatory regionref.

    Regulatory region of SV40. DNA sequence profiles of regulatory regions of SV40 isolates from monkeys and humans and of human tumor-associated DNAs are shown. The diagrams are labeled as described in the legend to Fig. 4. Shown are laboratory-adapted strains (SV40-776, Baylor, and VA45-54), human isolates (SVCPC/SVMEN and SVPML-1), and viral sequences found associated with human brain (CPT, CPP, CPC, and Ep) and bone (Ost) tumors. Tumor-associated sequences usually contain a simple (archetypal) regulatory region without duplications in the enhancer regionref.

    An appreciation of the replication cycle of SV40 is fundamental to understanding the oncogenic capacity of SV40 and its potential etiologic role in some human malignancies. The MHC class I molecules are the specific cell surface receptors for SV40ref1, ref2. This initial step in the viral cycle helps explain the broad tropism of the virus and its ability to infect and induce transformation in many types of cells and tissues. In addition, it provides an important distinction between SV40 and the other 2 polyomaviruses that are able to infect humans, JCV and BKV. JCV uses an N-linked glycoprotein and BKV uses a glycolipid as unique host cell receptors. These marked differences are believed to affect the nature of infections by these 3 viruses in tissues and individuals. After infection of a cell, SV40 produces large and small T-ags early in the viral replication cycle. These antigens bind and block important tumor suppressor proteins, which include p53, pRb, p107, and p130/Rb2ref1, Lednicky, J. A, 153-164, ref3. The functions of these intracellular proteins are centered in the control of the cell cycle. The tumor suppressor p53 is believed to sense DNA damage and either pauses the cell in late G1 for DNA repair or directs the cell to commit suicide through the apoptotic pathwayref1, ref2. Therefore, SV40 infections in humans may interfere with several pathways related to cell cycle control and lead to development of malignancies. Studies indicate that SV40 can replicate productively in human cells, including fetal tissuesref, newborn kidney cellsref, and different human tumor cell linesref, although it grows poorly in human fibroblastsref. Moreover, in vitro assays have shown that human cells can support replication of SV40, establishing that human proteins have the intrinsic ability to cooperate with SV40 T-ag to replicate SV40 DNAref1, ref2, ref3. Some human cell types undergo visible cell lysis in response to SV40, whereas others fail to exhibit cytopathic changes and produce low levels of virusref. General conclusions from these early studies are that SV40 can replicate in human cells and that various human cell types display differences in susceptibility to infection by SV40. The basis for the differences is unknown, but T-ag functions are believed to be importantref1, ref2. Recent studies have shown that primary human mesothelial cells respond to SV40 very differently from fibroblasts; the mesothelial cells are highly susceptible to SV40 infection and transformation. Most mesothelial cells were infected; few were killed; high levels of p53/T-ag complexes were present; Notch1, the hepatocyte growth factor receptor (Met), and IGF-1 were upregulated; and the tumor suppressor gene RASSF1A was inhibitedref1, ref2, ref3, ref4. SV40-positive human mesotheliomas show similar changes. The rate of transformation of SV40-infected mesothelial cells was at least 1,000 times higher than that of human fibroblastsref. These findings emphasize that different human cell types may display dramatically different virus-cell interactions during infection
    Transmission : => progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) in AIDS patients. SV40 has been associated with a PML-like disease in rhesus monkeys. For this reason, perhaps, there is still concern that SV40 exposure by an atypical route may rarely result in late-developing disease in humans.

    => SV40 is a potent DNA tumor virus, and mounting evidence suggests that it is an emergent human pathogenref1, ref2, ref3, ref4, ref5, ref6, ref7, ref8, ref9. Recently, the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies concluded that "the biological evidence is strong that SV40 is a transforming virus" and that "the biological evidence is of moderate strength that SV40 exposure could lead to cancer in humans under natural conditions"ref. In addition, 2 other independent scientific panels have made similar conclusionsref1, ref2. A recent analysis suggested that SV40 should be included in the list of group 2A carcinogens (i.e., agents for which evidence is indicative but not definitive for carcinogenesis in humans) by the International Agency for Research on Cancerref. The oncogenic capacity of SV40 infections has been well established in laboratory animal modelsref1, ref2, ref3, ref4. The latent period of tumor development in hamsters infected with SV40 ranges from 3 months to > 1 year. Following intravenous inoculation, about 33% of the animals developed > 1 histologic type of neoplasm, with osteosarcomas being most common after lymphomas. Following intracardiac inoculation, malignant mesotheliomas and osteosarcomas developed in addition to lymphomasref. The frequency of tumor development is usually > 90% in animals infected as newborns but is reduced in older animals. These data suggest that the age at the time of infection, the route of infection, and the duration of infection may be factors influencing the development of malignancies by SV40. An etiologic role of the virus in those cancers was supported because SV40 T-ag was expressed in all malignant cells, animals with tumors developed antibody against SV40 T-ag, and neutralization of SV40 with specific antibody before virus inoculation prevented cancer developmentref1, ref2. Sequence analyses and detection of T-ag protein ruled out laboratory contamination of tumor samples. Importantly, infectious SV40 was isolated from a primary brain cancer of a 4-year-old childref. An important consideration when evaluating the molecular biology data is the sensitivity of methods used to detect SV40 in human tumor samples. Early studies (before 1992) identified SV40-positive neoplasms by using indirect immunofluorescence for viral proteins or DNA hybridization techniquesref1, ref2, ref3, whereas studies after 1992 generally used PCR-based assays. During the last 3 decades > 60 original studies have reported the detection of SV40 in primary brainref and bone cancers, malignant mesotheliomaref1, ref2, ref3, ref4, and NHLref1, ref2, whereas a few studies have described an absence of SV40 in those malignancies. However, the small numbers of samples tested, the histologic types of malignancies examined, and the laboratory methodologies employed in some cases limit the significance of the results in those studies reported to be negative. Indeed, several steps need to be considered when performing molecular studies of human specimensref1, ref2, ref3. First, the extraction step of nucleic acids determines whether tissues yield adequate and suitable DNA or RNA for analysis. Unfortunately, with formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded specimens, degradation of nucleic acids and proteins is a common problem, and the quality of recovered DNA may be poor. If only small amounts of paraffin-embedded tissues are available, the yield of nucleic acids may be inadequate for analysis. Primers directed to a human cellular gene should be used to establish the suitability of a sample for PCR analysis. Because of the sensitivity of PCR-based assays, it is important to rigorously guard against laboratory contamination of samples and controls during processing or testing. Tissue processing and PCR assay setup should be performed in different facilities, from which positive controls (i.e., plasmids) are excluded. Negative tissue controls, extracted and analyzed in parallel, should be included in each experiment to monitor for reagent contamination. The selection of primers and PCR conditions greatly influences the sensitivity and reliability of the assay. Another factor is that tumor specimens usually contain mixtures of normal and malignant cells, in varying proportions. Variations in one or more of these important parameters may explain, at least in part, the ranges in positivity observed among some positive studies and the results obtained in some negative studies. Although numerous studies have detected SV40 in human primary brain and bone cancers, malignant mesothelioma, and NHL, the small sample sizes and the lack of a control group in some studies made it difficult to make conclusions about the extent to which SV40 may be associated with those human cancers. For this reason, we conducted a meta-analysis of controlled studiesref, an approach which can provide a more balanced and less biased estimate of the evidence than individual studiesref. For inclusion in the meta-analysis, reports had to meet the following criteria: studies were conducted among patients with primary malignancies, the investigation of SV40 was performed on primary cancer specimens and not on cultured cells, the analysis included a control group, and the same laboratory technique was used for both case and control samples. These criteria were established because the use of appropriate controls is crucial in the proper analysis of tissue for viral DNA, especially considering the sensitivity of PCR techniquesref. 35 independent studies met these inclusion criteria. In total, data from 1,793 patients with primary malignancies were evaluated to determine whether SV40 is significantly associated with primary brain cancer, malignant mesothelioma, bone cancer, and NHL. The neoplasias induced by SV40 in animal models includeref1, ref2, ref3 :

    This analysis of published reports found a significant excess risk of SV40 associated with human primary brain cancers, malignant mesotheliomas, bone cancers, and NHL compared to control samples. Therefore, the major types of human malignancies associated with SV40 are the same as those induced by SV40 in animal models. Although the proportion of human cancers containing SV40 varied from study to study, viral prevalence was always greater among primary tumors than among control tissues. Importantly, analysis of data indicated that SV40 may be etiologically meaningful in the development of a specific subset of human cancers. Multiple studies have shown the expression of SV40 mRNA and/or T-ag in cancer cells, the integration of SV40 sequences in some cancers, and SV40 T-ag protein complexed with p53 and pRb in some tumor specimensref1, ref2, ref3, ref4, ref5, ref6. These findings are compatible with current understanding of how SV40 T-ag mediates oncogenesis. These results from different experimental studies support the conclusion of the Institute of Medicine that "the biological evidence is of moderate strength that SV40 exposure could lead to cancer in humans under natural conditions."
    Laboratory examinations : positive tests for an immune response to SV40, as measured by the presence of antibodies against SV40, in human blood samples may actually represent a cross-reaction with antibodies to BKV or JCV, 2 common human viruses.

    Copyright © 2001-2005 Daniele Focosi. All rights reserved | Terms of use | Legal notices
    Add this page to your favourites  | About this site  | Acknowledgements  |  Open forum  |  Tell a friend about this site  | Current link partners
    Abbreviations and acronyms  |  Medical terminology  |  Add a link  | Translate this site into your favourite language  | Softwares

    This website subscribes to the HONcode principles of the HON Foundation. Click to verify.

     Search this site with : 
    Rate this webpage :
    PicoSearch
    Google
    Search 
    Search 
    for 
    Search Medical Dictionary 
    for 

    English to Spanish

    Spanish to English

    English to Italian

    Italian to English

    English to French

    French to English

    English Definition

    English to Spanish

    Spanish to English

    English to Italian

    Italian to English

    English to French

    French to English

    English Definition