-
hypofunctionality :
-
sclerema adiposum or neonatorum / Underwood's disease : a severe,
sometimes fatal, disorder of adipose tissue occurring chiefly in preterm,
sick, or debilitated infants suffering from a serious underlying illness,
manifested by diffuse, rapidly progressive, nonpitting induration of the
involved tissue, causing the skin to become cold, yellowish white, mottled,
boardlike, and inflexible
-
underweight / thinness (BMI < 18.5
kg / m2) (old classification : < 19.1 kg / m2
in females and < 20.7 kg / m2 in males)
-
class I : 17 < BMI < 18.4
-
class II : 16 < BMI < 16.9
-
class III : < 16
Aetiology :
-
constitutional
-
malnutrition

-
hypoanabolism
-
hypercatabolism
-
chronic poisoning
Pathogenesis : increased adiponectin
Therapy : aetiological, TPN
Experimental animal models : the first
inducible 'fatless' model system, the FAT-ATTAC mouse (fat apoptosis
through targeted activation of caspase 8). This transgenic mouse develops
identically to wild-type littermates. Apoptosis of adipocytes can be induced
at any developmental stage by administration of a FK1012 analog leading
to the dimerization of a membrane-bound, adipocyte-specific caspase 8-FKBP
fusion protein. Within 2 weeks of dimerizer administration, FAT-ATTAC mice
show near-knockout levels of circulating adipokines and markedly reduced
levels of adipose tissue. FAT-ATTAC mice are glucose intolerant, have diminished
basal and endotoxin-stimulated systemic inflammation, are less responsive
to glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and show increased food intake
independent of the effects of leptin. Most importantly, we show that functional
adipocytes can be recovered upon cessation of treatment, allowing the study
of adipogenesis
in vivo, as well as a detailed examination of the
importance of the adipocyte in the regulation of multiple physiological
functions and pathological statesref.
-
hyperfunctionality : hyperliposis:
an excess of fat in the blood serum or tissues
Grading :
-
adiposis : fatty change of an organ or tissue
-
adiposis dolorosa
/ Dercum's disease : a disease accompanied by painful localized fatty
swellings in trunk and limbs (expecially near knees) and by various nerve
lesions. The disease is usually seen in obese postmenopausal women, and
may cause death from pulmonary complications.
Therapy : liposuction
-
adiposis tuberosa simplex /
Anders' diseases : a disorder resembling adiposis dolorosa, marked
by development in the subcutaneous tissue of fatty masses which are sometimes
painful to pressure
-
adiposis universalis : a deposit
of fat generally throughout the body, including the internal organs.
-
overweight sensu latu (BMI > 25
kg / m2)
-
preobesity / overweight sensu strictu
(25 < BMI < 30 kg / m2 or Lorentz index = 110-130%; old
classification : borderline overweight = BMI = 25.8-27.3 kg / m2
in females, 26.4-27.8 kg / m2 in males; overweight = 27.3-32-3
kg / m2 in females, 27.8-31.1 kg / m2 in males)
Epidemiology : worldwide prevalence >
1 billion
-
USA by 1999-2000 NHANES estimates, 35% of US adults is overweight; 30%
of newborns are overweight : 30% remains in childhood and 80% in adolescence
-
Europe : prevalence > 50% of people
-
UK : 44% of men and 33% of women were classed as overweight in 2003ref.
The prevalence of obesity in UK children aged 2 to 10 increased from 9.9%
in 1995 to 13.7% in 2003. The total number of overweight and obese children
rose from 22.7% to 27.7% in this period. Obesity increased most in older
children aged 8 to 10, rising from 11.2% in 1995 to 16.5% in 2003. Levels
of obesity were similar for both sexes, increasing from 9.6% in 1995 to
14.9% in 2003 for boys and from 10.3% to 12.5% for girls. More detailed
figures for 2001 and 2002 provided information on risk factors for obesity.
Children living in households with the lowest incomes had higher rates
of obesity than those from households with the highest household incomes
(15.8% v 13.3%). Levels of obesity were 5% higher among children living
in the most deprived areas (16.4%) compared with children from the least
deprived (11.2%). Obesity levels were lowest in Yorkshire and the Humber
and the south east (11%-13%), and highest in the north east and London
(about 18%) in 2001-2. Children living in inner city areas were particularly
prone to obesity. Based on socioeconomic groups (analysed using the national
statistics socioeconomic classification, similar to social class), 17.1%
of children whose parents had semiroutine or routine occupations were obese
compared with 12.4% of those from managerial and professional households.
Children were much more likely to be overweight or obese if both parents
were overweight or obese. 19.8% of children living in households in which
both parents were overweight or obese were themselves obese compared with
6.7% of children living in households in which neither parent was overweight
or obese and 8.4% of children living in households in which one of the
two parents was overweight or obese. The study used the 85th and 95th percentiles
of the 1990 UK data as cut-off points for overweight and obesity. Figures
for subsequent years were then compared with the 1990 reference data. These
statistics show the urgent need for public health measures to reduce the
growing obesity epidemic, with the young as a key target. Measures should
be introduced across the board, including efforts to increase breastfeeding,
for which rates are abysmal in the UK, through to measures to change food
intake and physical activity levels. The recent government initiatives
to highlight obesity are welcomed but the target of halting the rise in
childhood obesity by 2010 was too conservative : it potentially condemns
children not yet born to the current unacceptably high rates of obesity.
Measures to reduce childhood obesity, such as replacing unhealthy foods
and drinks in school vending machines with healthier alternatives and stopping
the advertising of unhealthy foods to children, could be introduced immediately.
At the same time longer term measures could be devised, such as changing
food content and improving food labelling. Reducing obesity in children
has to be a high priority for public health. The findings were based on
information collected from the Health Survey for England, an annual survey
that interviews about 16 000 adults and 4000 children and includes height
and weight measurements, enabling body mass index to be calculated. Additional
information was collected in 2002, when more children were interviewed
than in a standard year. This information was combined with data collected
from children and young adults interviewed in 2001 to generate much larger
sample sizes to enable comparisons between different subgroupsref.
-
Italy : prevalence = 30%
-
China : prevalence = 137 million adults (doubled in women and almost tripled
in men from 1989 to 1997)ref
-
obesity / adiposity / adipositas (BMI > 30
kg/mBSA2 or Lorentz index > 130%; old classification
: BMI > 32.3 kg / m2 in females, > 31.1 kg / m2 in
males)
-
hemiobesity : obesity of one side of the body only.
-
class I / mild obesity (30
< BMI < 35 kg/mBSA2)
-
class II / moderate obesity
(35 < BMI < 40 kg/mBSA2)
-
class III / severe or extreme
obesity (BMI > 40 kg/mBSA2) / morbidly or very
severely obese
-
super-obesity (BMI > 50 kg/mBSA2)
Epidemiology : worldwide > 300 million are
obese. The obesity epidemic is recognized by WHO as one of the top 10 global
health problems.
-
USA : by 1999-2000 NHANES estimates, 30.5% of adults are obese (compared
with 22.9% in 1988-1994, with even higher rates in ethnic minority groups)
and 5% are very severely obese. About 2 of every 3 US adults and 4 of 5
African-American women were overweight or obese in 1999-2000. In children
and adolescents, the prevalence of being overweight rose by 50% in the
past decade to about 15%. The medical and economic outcomes of excessive
bodyweight are great, including an estimated 300,000 excess deaths and
at least US$100 billion per year in medical expenditures. One particularly
ominous public-health issue is the occurrence of glucose intolerance and
type 2 diabetes in obese adolescents and young adults. For the first time
in recent history, researchers are predicting that the life expectancy
of Americans may begin a sustained decline. By the middle of this century,
the increased risk of diabetes, heart disease and cancer that they will
face could lessen the average life expectancy by 2-5 years. In general,
longevity predictions are determined by studying historical trends in death
rates. Forecasts of life expectancy are an important component of public
policy that influence age-based entitlement programs such as Social Security
and Medicare. Various agencies, such as the US Social Security Administration
(SSA), have used this method to predict that the life expectancy of Americans
will continue to rise over the next century, but they ignore the effect
of obesity on future generationsref.
Extrapolating to the whole population, at the moment, obesity reduces average
life expectancy by about 4-9 months. And because the prevalence of obesity
among children and teenagers has risen sharply over the past 30 years,
the researchers predict that the shortening effect could become as much
as 2-5 years by mid-century. It's equivalent to the negative effect of
cancer on population longevity, which is 3.5 years. Obesity should be a
significant factor in life expectancy projections, but forecasts by agencies
try to balance negative factors with positives, such as medical breakthroughs.
The 2006 IOM report Food Marketing to Children and Youth: Threat or
Opportunity provides a chilling account of how this practice affects
children's health. Food marketing, the IOM says, intentionally targets
children who are too young to distinguish advertising from truth and induces
them to eat high-calorie, low-nutrient (but highly profitable) "junk" foods;
companies succeed so well in this effort that business-as-usual cannot
be allowed to continue. Since the late 1970s, obesity rates have more than
doubled among children 6 to 11 years of age and more than tripled among
those 12 to 19 years of age. At least 30% of the calories in the average
child's diet derive from sweets, soft drinks, salty snacks, and fast food.
Soft drinks account for > 10% of the caloric intake, representing a doubling
since 1980. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, even babies
consume measurable quantities of soft drinks, and pediatricians say it
is not unusual for overweight children to consume 1200 to 2000 calories
per day from soft drinks alone. The IOM conducted its study under a considerable
handicap. Companies would not provide proprietary information, because
the IOM is required to make public all documents it uses. The report reveals
why companies insist on keeping such research private. It lists numerous
firms that conduct marketing research focused even on preschool children,
using methods — photography, ethnography, focus groups — in an Orwellian-sounding
fashion to elucidate the psychological underpinnings of children's food
choices, "kid archetypes," the "psyche of mothers as the family gatekeeper,"
and "parent–child dyads of information." This enterprise is breathtaking
in its comprehensive and unabashed effort to provide a research basis for
exploiting the suggestibility of young children. Although marketers justify
appeals to children as "training" in consumer culture, as free speech,
and as good for business, they are not selling just any consumer product:
they are selling junk foods to children who would be better off not eating
them. American children spend nearly $30 billion of their own money annually
on such foods, and companies design products to tap this market. Since
1994, U.S. companies have introduced about 600 new children's food products;
50% of them have been candies or chewing gums, and another 25% are other
types of sweets or salty snacks. Only 25% are more healthful items, such
as baby foods, bread products, and bottled waters. Companies support sales
of "kids' foods," with marketing budgets totaling an estimated $10 billion
annuallyref.
Kellogg spent $22.2 million just on media advertising to promote 139.8
million dollars' worth of Cheez-It crackers in 2004, but these figures
are dwarfed by McDonald's $528.8 million expenditure to support $24.4 billion
in sales. Marketing to children is hardly new, but recent methods are far
more intense and pervasive. Television still predominates, but the balance
is shifting to product placements in toys, games, educational materials,
songs, and movies; character licensing and celebrity endorsements; and
less visible "stealth" campaigns involving word of mouth, cellular-telephone
text messages, and the Internet. All aim to teach children to recognize
brands and pester their parents to buy them. The IOM notes that by two
years of age, most children can recognize products in supermarkets and
ask for them by name. But the most insidious purpose of marketing is to
persuade children to eat foods made "just for them" — not what adults are
eating. Some campaigns aim to convince children that they know more about
what they are "supposed to" eat than their parents do. Marketers explicitly
attempt to undermine family decisions about food choices by convincing
children that they, not adults, should control those choicesref.
Indeed, children now routinely report that they, and not their parents,
decide what to eat. The IOM concludes that its data establish a "need and
an opportunity [to] . . . turn food and beverage marketing forces toward
better diets for American children and youth." This will be no small task.
Junk foods are major sources of revenue for food companies. In response
to threats of lawsuits and legislation, companies are scrambling to support
health and exercise programs, to announce policies renouncing advertising
directed at children under certain ages, and to make their products appear
more healthful. Hence: vitamin-enriched candy, whole-grain chocolate cereals,
and trans fat–free salty snacks. Yet candies, soft drinks, and snack foods
remain the most heavily promoted products. Companies must do better. At
the moment, their efforts — and those of government agencies — to promote
more healthful foods "remain far short of their full potential." If the
industry does not change its practices voluntarily, "Congress should enact
legislation mandating the shift." Strong words, but the IOM can only advise.
Others, however, can act. In January 2006, advocacy groups announced a
Massachusetts lawsuit to enjoin Kellogg and Viacom, owner of the Nickelodeon
television network, from promoting junk foods to childrenref.
Dozens of state legislatures have introduced bills to curb food marketing,
and parent and advocacy groups are demanding bans on food marketing in
schools. Such efforts may push U.S. policies in the direction of those
of > 50 other countries that regulate television advertising aimed at children.
Australia, for example, bans food advertisements meant for children <
14 years of age; the Netherlands bans advertisements for sweets to those
younger than 12; and Sweden bans the use of cartoon characters to promote
foods to children < 12. Although such actions have not eliminated childhood
obesity — rates in these countries are increasing, although they remain
lower than the U.S. rate — they may help to slow current trends. In contrast,
U.S. regulations apply only to time: commercials may take up to 12 minutes
per hour during weekdays but "only" 10.5 minutes per hour on weekends.
The IOM report provides plenty of evidence to support additional policy
actions. Worth serious consideration, I believe, are restrictions or bans
on the use of cartoon characters, celebrity endorsements, health claims
on food packages, stealth marketing, and marketing in schools, along with
federal actions that promote media literacy, better school meals, and consumption
of fruits and vegetables. Without further changes in society, such actions
may not be enough to prevent childhood obesity, but they should make it
much easier for parents — and health care providers — to encourage children
to eat more healthfullyref
-
Europe : prevalence = 20%
-
UK : between 1993 and 2003 the percentage of men who were obese rose from
13% to 23% and the percentage of women rose from 16% to 23%ref
-
Italy : prevalence = 10%
-
China : around 18 million adultsref
Aetiology : if only 1 parent is obese, the
child has a 40% likelihood to be obese; when both parents are obese, the
child has a 80% likelihood to be obese.
-
intrinsic aetiology
-
POMC / a-MSH
deficiency
-
prohormone
convertase 1 (PC1) deficiency
-
MC1R
deficiency (5% of severe obesity cases)
-
MC3R
deficiciency
-
MC4R
deficiency
-
leptin
deficiency (rare)
-
leptin receptor
deficiency (rare)
-
primarary hyperlipidemias

-
Prader-Willi syndrome
(PWS)
: chromosomal abnormalities underlying the disease cause the highest ghrelin
levels ever measured in any humans
-
11b-HSD-1
excess
-
functional inactivation of a single allele of the homeobox gene Prox1led
to adult-onset obesity due to abnormal lymph leakage from mispatterned
and ruptured lymphatic vesselsref
-
mice GE to overexpress Wnt10b
under the control of the adipocyte-specific promoter FABP4
eat unlimited amounts of high-fat mouse chow, but consume slightly less
oxygen and have about 50% less body fat than normal mice on a low-fat diet.
And despite they produce half the normal amount of leptin, the insulin
sensitivity and glucose tolerance of transgenic mice on a high-fat diet
was better than that of normal mice on a low-fat diet : they show no signs
of diabetes or other metabolic disorders, which are common in animals with
too little fat. The mice have underdeveloped mammary glands, an inability
to generate body heat and skin that's twice as thick as normal.
-
c-Cbl
-/-
mice exhibit a profound increase in whole-body energy expenditure as determined
by 10°C increased core temperature and 30% increased whole-body oxygen
consumption. As a consequence, these mice displayed a 50% decrease in adiposity,
primarily due to a reduction in cell size despite a 30% increase in food
intake. These changes were accompanied by a significant increase in activity
(2- to 3-fold). In addition, c-Cbl-/- mice displayed a marked
improvement in whole-body insulin action, primarily due to changes in muscle
metabolism, making it more resistant to type II diabetes. They also have
increased protein levels of the insulin receptor (4-fold) and uncoupling
protein-3 (UCP-3)
(2-fold) in skeletal muscle and a significant increase in the phosphorylation
of AMPK and acetyl-CoA carboxylaseref.
-
extrinsic aetiology
-
secondary hyperlipidemias

-
adiposis cerebralis / cerebral adiposity
: obesity due to a lesion in the brain, especially the hypothalamus, as
in adiposogenital dystrophy
-
Human adenovirus type
36

-
motivational factors and food preference development
-
overconsumption of energy (easy availability of a wide variety of
good-tasting, inexpensive, energy-dense foods and the serving of these
foods in large portions). 81.5 pounds of corn sweeteners are consumed per
capita in the US each year (a 586% increase since 1966). There has been
a 20% increase in the price of a soft drink in the US vs. a 118% increase
in the price of fresh fruit and vegetables since 1985. There are 10 federal
subsidies, in billions of dollars, to the US corn industryref.
Because of its rapid development in genetically stable populations, the
obesity epidemic can be attributed to environmental factors affecting diet,
or physical activity level. One potentially important dietary factor is
consumption of fast food, which can be defined as convenience food purchased
in self-service or carry-out eating places. From its origins in the 1950s,
fast food has grown into a dominant dietary pattern, with a current estimate
of about 247115 restaurants in the USA. Consumption of fast food by children
has risen from 2% of total energy in the late 1970s to 10% of energy in
the 1990s. Several factors inherent to fast food as it now exists could
promote a positive energy balance and thereby increase risk for obesity
and diabetes, including: excessive portion size, with single large meals
often approaching or exceeding individual daily energy requirement; palatability,
emphasising primordial taste preferences for sugar, salt, and fat; high
energy density; and high glycaemic load. Several dietary factors such as
trans-fatty
acids and high glycaemic load might also enhance risk for diabetes through
energy-independent mechanisms. Surprisingly few studies have investigated
the effects of fast-food consumption on energy balance or bodyweight, and
most of these are of cross-sectional design. The Coronary Artery Risk Development
in Young Adults (CARDIA) showed that participants who consumed fast food
>= 2 times a week gained approximately 10 more pounds and had twice as
great increase in insulin resistance in the 15-year period than participants
who consumed fast food less than once per weekref.
-
reduction of total energy expenditure by reducing physical activity
(reduction in jobs requiring physical labor, reduction in energy expenditures
at school and in daily living, and an increase in time spent on sedentary
activities such as watching television, surfing the Web, and playing video
games. There is a 6% increase in the likelihood of becoming obese per hour
spent in a car each day
-
depression

-
short sleep duration : in population studies, a dose-response relationship
with high BMI has been reported across all age groupsref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4,
ref5,ref6,
ref7.
In the largest studied sample, elevated BMI occurred for habitual sleep
amounts below 7–8 href.
A U-shaped curvilinear relationship between sleep duration and BMI was
observed for women, but for men, there was a monotonic trend towards higher
BMI with shorter sleep duration. Importantly, a recent prospective study
identified a longitudinal association between sleep curtailment and future
weight gainref.
Patients with short sleep had reduced leptin
and elevated ghrelin
.
These differences in leptin and ghrelin are likely to increase appetite,
possibly explaining the increased BMI observed with short sleep duration.
In Western societies, where chronic sleep restriction is common and food
is widely available, changes in appetite regulatory hormones with sleep
curtailment may contribute to obesityref.
Habitual sleep duration below 7.7 h was associated with increased BMI,
similar to findings in other studies including childrenref1,
ref2,
adolescentsref,
and adultsref1,
ref2.
A significant association of sleep duration with leptin and ghrelin that
is independent of BMI, age, sex, sleep-disordered
breathing (SDB)
(a pathology associated with increased BMI), and other possible confounding
factors (analysis not shown for SDB and other confounders) has also been
reported. Short sleep duration was associated with decreased leptin and
increased ghrelin, changes that have also been observed in reaction to
food restriction and weight loss and are typically associated with increased
appetite. These hormone alterations may contribute to the BMI increase
that occurs with sleep curtailment. Previous studies have shown that both
acute sleep deprivationref
and chronic partial sleep deprivation (sleep restriction)ref
can cause a decrease in serum leptin concentrations. These studies, however,
were performed under highly controlled laboratory circumstances and results
validate the association of decreased leptin with decreased sleep time
in a large sample of adults under real-life conditions and, now, indicate
a role for ghrelin. Leptin deficiency increases appetite and produces obesityref1,
ref2.
Leptin administration suppresses food intake and reduces energy expenditureref1,
ref2.
Importantly, low leptin as observed with sleep loss has a greater impact
on appetite than high leptin levels, which are associated with leptin resistance,
as occurs with obesityref.
Levels of ghrelin, a potent stimulator of appetiteref1,
ref2,
ref3,
were higher in those with shorter sleep. Ghrelin levels are also positively
associated with hunger ratingsref,
but decrease with increased BMI. In one study, after 3 mo of dietary supervision,
a reduction in BMI of approximately 5% was associated with a 12% increase
in ghrelin and a 15% decrease in leptinref.
These changes, in participants of similar BMI to our sample and presumably
producing increased appetite, are comparable to those observed with sleep
loss of 2–3 h/night. With sleep loss, however, relatively high ghrelin
and low leptin levels are associated with increased BMI. These changes
can be hypothesized to play a contributory, rather than compensatory, role
in the development of overweight and obesity with sleep restriction. Hormone
measurements were all performed on a single fasted, morning sample and
may not reflect the 24-h profile. It is possible that participants with
shorter sleep woke up earlier and that hormone differences may be partially
related to circadian time. Leptin and ghrelin levels rise slightly during
the nightref,
and this could result in higher hormone levels in short sleepers. This
may be an issue for ghrelin, as levels increased with acute sleep restriction.
It is, however, unlikely to play a role in the leptin finding, since lower
levels were found with chronic but not acute sleep restriction. Additionally,
studies have shown a high correlation between morning, fasting leptin and
ghrelin levels and 24-h mean profileref1,
ref2.
Ghrelin and leptin changes were unaffected by morningness tendencies. The
fact that studies investigating the diurnal profile of these hormones found
similar hormonal changes over the entire 24-h period after experimental
sleep restriction also corroborates our resultsref.
The robustness of these findings and similar observations from smaller
controlled studiesref
also suggest that our statistically significant results are unlikely to
be a reflection of the number of analyses carried out. Animal studies have
suggested a link between sleep and metabolismref.
In rats, prolonged, complete sleep deprivation increased both food intake
and energy expenditure. The net effect was weight loss and, ultimately,
deathref.
Rats fed a high protein-to-calorie diet had accelerated weight loss, compared
to sleep-deprived rats fed calorie-augmented (fatty) diets. Food consumption
remained normal in sleep-deprived rats fed protein-rich diets, but increased
250% in rats fed calorie-rich diets. Preference for fatty foods has also
been reported anecdotally in sleep-deprived humans. Sleep deprivation may
thus increase not only appetite but also preference for lipid-rich, high-calorie
foods. Animal experiments that have found weight loss after prolonged sleep
deprivation have to be interpreted in the context of a stressful procedure
producing intense sleep debtref1,
ref2,
which may interfere with adequate food intake. From our study, we hypothesize
that the moderate chronic sleep debt associated with habitual short sleep
is associated with increased appetite and energy expenditure. In societies
where high-calorie food is freely available and consumption uncontrolled,
after milder chronic sleep restriction, the equation may be tipped towards
food intake for high-calorie food rather than expenditure, culminating
in obesity. Short sleepers may also have more time to overeat. Sleep loss
from a baseline of 7.7 h was associated with a dose-dependent increase
in BMI. This was the predominant effect in a population increasingly curtailing
sleepref.
Sleep > 7.7 h, however, was also associated with increased BMI. Patients
with SDB may spend a longer time in bed to compensate for fragmented sleep;
however, controlling for AHI did not change the curvilinear BMI–sleep association.
Another possibility is that in long sleepers, reduced energy expenditure
due to increased time in bed has a greater impact than reduced food intake.
In favor of this hypothesis, long sleepers exercise lessref.
The odds ratio of high levels of self-reported exercise (>7 h/wk), based
on a single survey question, decreased with increased sleep time, but controlling
for this variable also did not change our findings. Insulin resistance
with sleep deprivation has been reported in a laboratory study of young,
healthy volunteersref.
When controlling for BMI, we found no significant correlation between insulin,
glucose, or adiponectin levels and various measures of sleep duration.
Also, there was no significant correlation between QUICKI (or the homeostatic
model assessment HOMAref)
and sleep duration. This may be due to difficulties in detecting small
effects on glucose tolerance under less-controlled conditions of large
population studies.
-
drugs
-
maternal obesity results in increased risk for metabolic disease in offspring.
Recent studies in rodents suggest that brain pathways controlling food
intake and energy metabolism also continue to develop postnatally, and
that perturbations during critical periods can result in abnormal development
with consequences for normal function of these regulatory pathways
Current aspirational values are the modern version of the Aristostelean
"good life". The assumption is that high productivity will make the "good
life" possible and technology will fuel higher productivity. The irony
is that technology and the accompanying productivity have created a faster
and more stressful pace of life, with time pressures for us all. We no
longer have sufficient time for traditional food preparation, which has
created the demand for prepackaged and fast food. Time pressures have fueled
the need to get places faster, which causes us to drive rather than walk,
to take the elevators instead of the stairs, and to look to technology
for ways to engineer inefficient physical activity out of our lives. Our
relentless quest for improved productivity and efficiency has fueled increased
demand for getting better and better deals, that is, getting more for less.
The entry of large numbers of women into the workforce and the increase
in single-parent families have changed the structure of many families and
increased the value of convenience. Now, more than ever, we value the ability
to conduct many aspects of everyday business without ever having to step
out of our cars. Our biology, which evolved in times of frequent famine,
is now essentially maladaptive in our environment of food abundance and
sedentariness. For people who lived in times of privation, such as hunter-gatherers,
food was only sporadically available and the risk of famine was ever present.
In such an environment, genes that predispose to obesity increase energy
stores and provide a survival advantage in times of famine. This is the
so-called "thrifty gene hypothesis" put forth by James Neel in 1962.
Indeed, thrifty genes could be imagined to be genes that lead to leptin
resistance, the end result of which would be the efficient retention of
nutrients as adipose tissue. Consistent with this idea is the finding that
obesity and an increase of plasma leptin levels, indicative of leptin resistance,
are characteristic of Pima Indians living a "Western" life-style,
whereas Pima Indians living a more "native" life-style remain leaner and
have low leptin levels. For people descended from the inhabitants of the
Fertile Crescent or, more recently, Western societies, the risk of starvation
was markedly reduced by the domestication of plants and animals and the
ability to store food. In this environment, selection against obesity might
be expected. Some argue that because the health consequences of obesity
generally affect people beyond child-bearing age, genetic selection against
obesity is not robust. However, among other things, obesity is associated
with
gestational diabetes, which has
potentially deleterious consequences and would thus be strongly selected
against. Gestational diabetes increases the risk of miscarriage and it
can also lead to a cephalopelvic disproportion, an event that can have
catastrophic consequences for both mother and child. Although the health
complications of obesity are often not evident until later in life, it
has also been shown that depriving children of the care and emotional support
provided by their grandparents, expecially grandmothers, has important
consequences. A number of recent reports note the pivotal role of grandparents
in gathering food for children and emphasize their critical role in the
human social structure. In addiction, increased adiposity is associated
with an increased risk of predation in animals. Thus, in circumstances
where the risk of starvation is reduced, one might expect genes that resist
obesity and its complications to have a selective advantage. Such selection
can, in principle, be quite rapid. Thus, in modern times, the lean carry
genes that protect them from the consequences of obesity, whereas the obese
carry genes that are atavism of a time of nutritional privation in which
they no longer live.
Pathogenesis : peripheral and CNS insulin
-resistance
and leptin
-resistance
-
serum leptin-interacting proteins (SLIPs), isolated by leptin-affinity
chromatography and identified by mass spectrometry and immunochemical analysis
: one of the major SLIPs is C-reactive
protein (CRP)
.
In vitro, human CRP directly inhibits the binding of leptin to its
receptors and blocks its ability to signal in cultured cells. In vivo,
infusion of human CRP into ob/ob mice blocked the effects of leptin upon
satiety and weight reduction. In mice that express a transgene encoding
human CRP, the actions of human leptin were completely blunted. Physiological
concentrations of leptin can stimulate expression of CRP in human primary
hepatocytes. Recently, human CRP has been correlated with increased adiposity
and plasma leptin. Thus, our results suggest a potential mechanism contributing
to leptin resistance, by which circulating CRP binds to leptin and attenuates
its physiological functionsref.
=> hyperleptinemia and increased adipose tissue =>lipotoxicity
mediated by adipokines :
-
increased TNF-a
secretion => down-regulation of InsR
,
inhibition of NO production by endothelial cells
-
resistin
=> insulin-resistance in skeletal muscle
-
increased IL-6
=> increased hepatic synthesis of haptoglobin
-
decreased adiponectin

-
increased circulating FFA => inhibition of glycogen synthetase, GLUT-4
and hexokinase, inhibition of NO production by endothelial cells
-
increased tissue triglycerids
-
increased tissue acylCoA
Most obese humans tend to have lower ghrelin
levels than people of normal weight, but production increases in people
who have lost weight through dieting. Many think that leptin's main role
is protecting against weight loss in times of deprivation rather than against
weight gain in times of plenty : when a person's fat stores shrink, so
does leptin incretion (in response, appetite increases while metabolism
decreases), but the converse does not happen (beyond a certain point, increased
leptin production does little to inhibit appetite or increase metabolism).
The activity of regions involved in generating emotions in response
to and in recognition of the taste of food (middle dorsal insula and cerebellum,
precuneus, posterior cingulate, and temporal and orbitofrontal cortices)
is especially high in obese individuals compared to the nonobese.
5,088 bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences from the distal intestinal
(cecal) microbiota of genetically obese ob/ob mice, lean ob/+ and wild-type
siblings, and their ob/+ mothers, all fed the same polysaccharide-rich
diet, were analyzed. Although the majority of mouse gut species are unique,
the mouse and human microbiota(s) are similar at the division (superkingdom)
level, with Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes dominating. Microbial-community
composition is inherited from mothers. However, compared with lean mice
and regardless of kinship, ob/ob animals have a 50% reduction in the abundance
of Bacteroidetes and a proportional increase in Firmicutes. These changes,
which are division-wide, indicate that, in this model, obesity affects
the diversity of the gut microbiota and suggest that intentional manipulation
of community structure may be useful for regulating energy balance in obese
individualsref.
In adipocytes, stimulation of b-ARs increases
cAMP levels and activates PKA, which stimulates lipolysis by phosphorylating
hormone-sensitive lipase and perilipin. Acute insulin treatment activates
PDE3B, reduces cAMP levels and quenches b-AR
signalling. In contrast, chronic hyperinsulinaemic conditions (typical
of type 2 diabetes) enhance b-AR-mediated cAMP
production. This amplification of cAMP signalling is paradoxical because
it should enhance lipolysis, the opposite of the known short-term effect
of hyperinsulinaemia. In adipocytes, chronically high insulin levels inhibit
b-ARs
(but not other cAMP-elevating stimuli) from activating PKA. Disruption
of PKA scaffolding mimics the interference of insulin with b-AR
signalling. Chronically high insulin levels may disrupt the close apposition
of b-ARs and PKA, identifying a new mechanism
for crosstalk between heterologous signal transduction pathwaysref.
Even if they are healthy, people with more adipose tissue also tend
to have higher levels of CRP
.
Previous research, however, had only found CRP to be produced in liver
tissue, although Drs. Yeh, Willerson and Paolo Calabro, MD, discovered
in 2003 that the protein also is manufactured in the walls of blood vessels.
But that didn't explain obesity's connection to high levels of CRP and
it also was not clear why CRP is higher in patients who have metabolic
disorders. So the research team decided to see whether fat cells themselves
could be stimulated by inflammatory cytokines or resistin
to produce CRP. To help find out, plastic surgery patients at M.D. Anderson
donated adipose tissue that would have been discarded, and the research
team then isolated fat cells, cultured them and stimulated them under a
number of different conditions. The cells produced cytokines that resulted
in inflammation and that this process triggered production of high levels
of CRP. Resistin, produced itself by fat cells, could stimulate production
of CRP. Patients with metabolic syndromes have higher levels of CRPs, as
well as a higher risk of developing heart disease and stroke, but no one
understands why that is. Aspirin, statins and troglitazone can reduce CRP
levels in cultured fat cells that were producing high levels of CRPsref
Visceral fat distribution :
-
ginoid obesity (diffuse but mainly
in glutei and hips; pear-shaped)
-
android obesity (inner omentum; apple-shaped)
is more dangerous than diffuse one and is graded with abdominal circumference
-
> 88 cm for females
-
> 102 cm for males
The value can be corrected measuring circumference at glutei height as
waist-hip
ratio (WHR) :
-
> 0.9 in males
-
> 0.8 in females
... but WHR has a lower prognostic value.
Therapy :
-
behavioral therapy
-
calorie restriction

-
limit fat assumption to 30% of daily calories
-
10% from saturated fatty acids
-
10% from monounsaturated fatty acids
-
10% from PUFAs
-
limit cholesterol assumption to 200 mg / day
-
eat vegetables to reduce cholesterol assorption
-
limit assumption of ethanol and coffeee
-
there is insufficient evidence to make recommendations for or against the
use of low-carbohydrate
diets
,
particularly among participants older than age 50 years, for use > 90 days,
or for diets < 20 g/d of carbohydrates. Among the published studies,
participant weight loss while using low-carbohydrate diets was principally
associated with decreased caloric intake and increased diet duration but
not with reduced carbohydrate contentref.
Indeed, a low carbohydrate diet appears to help patients lose more weight
than other diets up until the 6-month mark. But by 1 year, the difference
between low-carbohydrate and low fat diets disappears. Doctors should help
patients choose a diet that helps them reduce portion size and that includes
a healthy eating lifestyle they can stick to. Preliminary research on new
internet-based weight loss programs suggests the technology may be a useful
tool for some patients. Overweight patients who have access to online weight
loss resources lost on average 1.6 kg over 6 months. Subjects who also
submitted calorie and exercise information to an online bulletin board
and received weekly e-mail counseling and feedback lost considerably more,
or 4.1 kg over the same time periodref1,
ref2.
-
active lifestyle
-
gene therapy

-
chemotherapy
-
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors
(atorvastatin 10 mg daily is safe and efficacious in reducing the risk
of first cardiovascular disease events (acute coronary heart disease events,
coronary revascularisation, or stroke) by 33% (48% for stroke) and death
rate by 27% in patients with type 2 diabetes without high LDL-cholesterol
-
lipase inhibitors
(orlistat) interfere with fatty acid hydrolysis and uptake by the gut,
but produces only modest weight loss and may have unwelcome side effects
-
PTP1B inhibitors

-
CNTF
allows the body to establish a new, svelter set point
-
CB1 antagonists
(rimonabant : these receptors support "the munchies", the food-craving
effects of marijuana)ref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4.
Recently reported phase III clinical trails show that 2-year treatment
with rimonabant reduced weight, reduced abdominal fat, and improved cardiovascular
risk factorsref1,
ref2.
The first in a new class of pharmaceutical agents, rimonabant is promising
as an anti-obesity therapy, but its clinical value compared with that of
existing therapies must await results of future investigations.
-
MC1R inhibitors

-
MC3R agonists

-
MC4R agonists

-
antagonists of the receptor for melanin-concentrating hormone
-
GLP-1
.
Exendin-4 is a 39–amino acid peptide originally isolated from the saliva
of the Gila Monster that resists degradation by DPP-IV while retaining
GLP-1–like effects on glucose metabolism and food intakeref.
Activity of GLP-1 is prolonged by conjugation to albumin (liraglutide)
or inhibition of DPP-IV
-
amylin
causes weight loss in diabetic cohorts, but its efficacy in the general
population is uncertain
-
PYY(3–36) : a number of formulations are currently under development
as obesity therapeutics, although effective small-molecule mimics are lacking
-
stimulation of endogenous GLP-1 and PYY(3–36) secretion by specific L
cell secretagogues is a promising avenue that remains to be exploited
-
ghrelin may ameliorate anorexiaref,
but the efficacy of ghrelin antagonists for treatment of obesity remains
unproven
-
whether energy balance will be improved in humans by inhibition of 11ß-HSD1
or alternatively activation of PPAR
,
as suggested by studies of OEA action, will await the results of clinical
trials.
-
b3 agonists
=> lipolysis
-
leptin
replacement is effective in the rare cases of human leptin deficiencyref,
but leptin resistance limits its utility in ordinary obesity. Increasing
leptin action by promoting its transport into the brain or by antagonizing
inhibitors of leptin signaling pathways might be effective, but the relevant
pharmaceutical targets have proven challenging
-
CNTF
acts through leptin-like pathways in the hypothalamus. Although effective
in animal models, human obesity trials were limited by neutralizing antibodiesref.
-
inhibition of angiogenesis by VEGFR2
blocking antibody not only reduces angiogenesis and tissue growth but also
inhibits preadipocyte differentiation : part of this inhibition stems from
the paracrine interaction between endothelial cells and preadipocytes and
that VEGF-VEGFR2 signaling in endothelial cells, but not preadipocytes,
mediates this process.
-
anorexiants
(sibutramine) produce only modest weight loss and may have unwelcome side
effects
-
current medications offer 5-8% weight loss when subtracted for a placebo
effect. And when taken in combination with behavior modification therapy,
the drugs appear to facilitate even more weight lossref.
However, treatment probably needs to be life long, many insurers will not
cover the cost, and the drugs may not be safe for long-term therapy. Some
evidence suggests weight loss drugs may not have to be taken consistently
over the long term. Preliminary research shows that intermittent therapy
with the drug sibutramine may deliver the same results over the long term
as it does when taken in uninterrupted therapyref.
-
overweight mice treated with s.c. (prohibitin (helps to regulate the growth
of blood vessels in white adipose tissue cells)-binding CKGGRAKDC peptide)-(proapoptotic
peptide) fusion protein each day for 4 weeks ate less food and lost 30%
of their original weight, but remained healthyref
-
bariatric surgery (BS) : 15,000,000
adults in the USA meet current guidelines for surgical intervention to
treat obesityref.
Once a last resort, surgery is increasing rapidly as a means of weight
control, from approximately 15,000 annual procedures in the early 1990s
to 109,000 operations in the USA in 2003ref.
Bariatric surgery can achieve substantial and long-term weight loss and
can improve or in some cases cure diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension,
and obstructive sleep apnea. If untreated, morbidly obese patients have
a 1 in 7 chance of reaching normal life expectancy.
Indications : majority of skeletal maturity
(generally > or =13 years of age for girls and > or =15 years of age for
boys)
-
BMI > 40 kg/mBSA2 (body weight > 45 kg above ideal
weight)
-
BMI = 35-39 kg/mBSA2 + plus at least one severe obesity-related
medical complication such as systemic arterial hypertension, type 2 diabetes
mellitus, heart failure, or OSA, skeletal diseases
After diet trials, exclusion of hypothyroidism or adrenal diseases and
psychiatric evaluation (risk for malpractice litigations in BPD
patients).
At the last review of the literature, there were 43 different operations
or modifications thereof used for the control of obesity. An effective
operation for obesity control should produce a significant weight loss
(>/= 25% excess weight loss) to ameliorate the associated medico-sociopsycho-economic
ramifications of the obesity. The operative and postoperative significant
morbidity should be < 20% and mortality < 1%. The weight lost should
be maintained for a long period (>/= 5 years). The effects of the operation
should be reproducible and documentable by > 2 authors working independently.
Based on these criteria, questionable operations for treatment of obesity
include: tooth wiring, acupuncture
,
hypothalamic center manipulation, liposuction
,
balloon
insertion, unbanded
gastric
partitioning
,
vagotomy
,
gastrogastrostomy
,
horizontal gastroplasty
,
gastric wrap, gastroclip, and any variety of gastroplasty without a reinforced
stoma, intestinal bypass, duodenal bypass and biliointestinal bypassref.
All bariatric surgical procedures have been performed as open and laparoscopic
procedures.
-
malabsorptive surgery
-
restrictive surgery
=> metabolic complications : vomiting, excessive weight loss, PEM
,
impaired immunocompetence, vitamin deficiency, expecially thiamine with
neuropathy/encephalopathy, hair loss, gallstone formation; anemia, iron
and vitamin B12 deficiency, dumping for gastric bypass
-
implantable
gastric stimulation (IGS) system

-
liposuction

Effect of different bariatric surgical procedures on long-term (>2
y) body weight :
It is difficult to determine the relative weight loss effectiveness of
each procedure because only vertical banded gastroplasty and gastric bypass
have been compared directly in RCTs. The data from these RCTs consistently
revealed that weight loss was greater with the gastric bypass procedure
than with vertical banded gastroplasty. Fewer studies have evaluated the
long-term effects of gastric banding, biliopancreatic diversion, and biliopancreatic
diversion with duodenal switch than gastric bypass or gastroplasty because
the procedure has been more recently developed or has been performed less
often. The perioperative mortality rate within 30 days after open bariatric
surgery is about 1% but can vary depending on the experience of the surgeon.
Approximately 75% of deaths are caused by anastomotic leaks and peritonitis
and
25% by pulmonary
embolism
.
Laparoscopic gastric bypass is associated with fewer wound complications,
less postoperative pain, less blood loss, and shorter hospital stays and
convalescence periods than does the open procedure; however, late anastomotic
strictures occur more frequently after the laparoscopic than after the
open procedure.
Peripheral neuropathy (PN) occurs more frequently after BS than after
another abdominal surgery. The three clinical patterns of PN after BS are
sensory-predominant polyneuropathy, mononeuropathy, and radiculoplexus
neuropathy. Malnutrition may be the most important risk factor, and patients
should attend nutritional clinics. Inflammation and altered immunity may
play a role in the pathogenesis, but further study is neededref.
Patients who are male, older (>50 yrs), heavier (BMI >60 kg/m2),
and who have complications requiring reoperation will likely need intensive
care. Additionally, males, heavier patients (BMI >60 kg/m2),
pulmonary co-morbidity, and need for reoperation may warrant need for extended
mechanical ventilation (MV) >24 hoursref.
Alcohol or drug addiction and concomitant serious disease are contraindications
for bariatric surgery. Before operation, a full assessment is needed to
identify possible eating behaviour disturbances and associated comorbidity
such as cardiovascular disease, sleep apnoea, metabolic and psychiatric
alterations which might induce intra and postoperative complications. Surgical
techniques can be classified as restrictive, malabsortive and mixed procedures.
Gastroplasty and adjustable gastric banding are restrictive techniques,
which are indicated in obese patients with body mass index less than 45
kg/m2. Mixed techniques are the most used procedures. They include
gastric by-pass which causes a reduction of 60-70% of weight excess, biliopancreatic
diversion and duodenal switch which can eliminate a 75% of body weight
excess. Following bariatric surgery a dramatic improvement in associated
comorbidity can be demonstrated, specially in what refers to diabetes,
hypertension, dislipidaemia and apnoea. Postoperative mortality is around
1-2%. Peritonitis and venous thromboembolism are the most serious complications.
Inferior vena cava filter placement is not only feasible and safe for the
morbidly obese individual undergoing gastric bypass, but should be strongly
considered for patients with risk factors for thromboembolic complications
or who experience postoperative complications requiring ICU stay or prolonged
immobilityref.
Postoperative follow-up should be lifelong and requires a progressive nutrition
planning and vitamin supplementation.
Obesity is a protective factor for :
Complications :
-
insulin
-resistance
=> hyperinsulinemia => type II diabetes mellitus
-
secondary dyslipidemias => systemic
arterial hypertension
=>
-
coronary
artery diseases (CAD)
.
Overweight children (age 5-23) are also at risk of heart attacks : the
greater the BMI, the greater the incidence and severity of left ventricular
mass or thickness.
-
stroke

-
hyperuricemia
=> gout
-
osteoarthrosis

-
gall-stones

-
restrictive
pulmonary disease
=> asthma
& hypercapnia => Pickwick
disease / pickwickian or obesity-hypoventilation syndrome [from the
description of Joe, the fat boy in Charles Dickens' Pickwick Papers]
: a complex of obesity, somnolence, snoring, hypoventilation, and erythrocytosis
-
hyperandrogenism => polycystic
ovary syndrome (PCOS) & dysmenorrhoea
=> infertility

-
reduced GH and testosterone incretion
-
increased cortisol
incretion
-
cancers
-
acanthosis nigricans

-
depression

-
Alzheimer's disease
(AD)
(demented women in their 80's are more likely to have an average BMI of
28 at 70 years of age : each additional point raises the risk of AD by
36%). Patients with diabetes can experience anything from short-term memory
loss to Alzheimer's-like symptoms and leptin is the key. An increasing
number of reports show that abnormal levels of leptin can significantly
alter brain cell function : intrahippocampal injection of leptin increases
long-term
potentiation
,
which provides a cellular basis for memory and learningref.
From studies of individual neurons isolated in a dish, the amount of leptin
produced by normal food intake in rats boosts long-term potentiation by
3 times. But increasing the dose 100-fold abolishes this effect. So could
abnormally high leptin levels in children with weight problems be hindering
their ability to perform in school? Given the increasing incidence of obesity
in the young, researchers should investigate the potential link. Understanding
the role of leptin secretion in metabolic disorders will help explain why
these illnesses increase the risk of impaired cognitive function. It may
tell us about what goes wrong in these diseases, which could serve as targets
for treatments.
-
real and immediate costs of obesity : normal-weight men spent an average
of $22.84 per month at the pharmacy. Overweight men averaged $39.27 per
month, and obese men spent $80.31 per month – about 3.5 times what their
normal-weight counterparts spent. For normal-weight men, prescriptions
for CHD risk factors cost $9.89 per month, and those for other medical
conditions cost $12.96 per month. For overweight men, CHD-related prescriptions
cost $18.41 per month and other prescriptions $20.86. For obese men, CHD-related
drugs cost $42.02 per month and other drugs were $38.29. All major CHD
risk factors except smoking increased as BMI class increased. The prevalence
of low back pain/degenerative joint disease, erectile dysfunction, sleep
apnea, gastroesophageal reflux, depression and gout increased as BMI increased.
-
weightism : weight racism, associating the image of obese with ridiculousness,
poor school grades, social isolation, negative body image, low self-esteem,
delayed or inadequate psychosocial development, early puberty, exclusion
from sport or modern activities
Obesity is an important risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD), ventricular
dysfunction, congestive heart failure, stroke, and cardiac arrhythmias.
Weight loss in obese patients can improve or prevent many of the obesity-related
risk factors for CHD (ie, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus,
dyslipidemia, hypertension, and inflammation) 1,2 and can improve diastolic
function.3 Therefore, it is important for cardiovascular healthcare professionals
to understand the clinical effects of weight loss and be able to implement
appropriate weight-management strategies in obese patients. The purpose
of this statement is to review the physiological and cardiovascular effects
of weight loss and provide clinicians with appropriate treatment guidelines
for weight management in patients with obesity and cardiovascular disease.
Clinical effects of weight loss
Body Composition
The increase in body fat mass in most obese persons represents primarily
an increase in the size of fat cells, although the number of fat cells
may also be increased, particularly in people with childhood-onset obesity.4
In addition, the specific distribution of excess fat can influence the
relationship between obesity and cardiac disease. Excess abdominal adipose
tissue, particularly visceral fat, and excess triglyceride content in liver,
skeletal muscle, and heart tissues are associated with hepatic and skeletal
muscle insulin resistance, impaired ventricular function, and increased
CHD.5–9 Although an energy deficit of 3500 kcal is needed tooxidize 1 lb
of adipose tissue, a 3500-kcal energy deficit will cause a 1-lb loss in
body weight because of the oxidation of lean tissue and associated water
losses. Approximately 75% of weight lost by dieting is composed of fat
and 25% is fat-free mass (FFM).10 The addition of exercise training to
a diet program can decrease the percentage of weight lost as FFM by half.10,11
Most, if not all, of the loss of fat results from a decrease in the size
(triglyceride content) of existing fat cells,12 not a decrease in the number
of fat cells.13 The distribution of fat loss is heterogeneous, with greater
relative losses of intraabdominal fat than total body fat mass, particularly
in men and women with increased initial intraabdominal fat mass.14 In addition,
diet-induced weight loss decreases intramyocellular15 and intrahepatic16
lipids.
Clinical Outcomes
Intentional weight loss can improve or prevent many of the obesity-related
risk factors for CHD (ie, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus,
dyslipidemia, hypertension, and inflammation). Moreover, these metabolic
benefits are often found after only modest weight loss (5% of initial
weight)and continue to improve in a monotonic fashion with increasing weight
loss.17
Metabolic Syndrome
The metabolic syndrome represents a constellation of physical and metabolic
abnormalities that are risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The characteristics
of this syndrome, as defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program
(NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood
Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III [ATP III]), include large
waist circumference, insulin-resistant glucose metabolism (impaired fasting
glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, and type 2 diabetes mellitus), dyslipidemia
(high triglyceride and low serum HDL-C
[cholesterol] concentrations), and increased blood pressure.18 Patients
who have the metabolic syndrome have a 1.5- to 3-fold increase in the risk
of CHD and stroke.19–21 Weight loss can improve all features of the metabolic
syndrome.17
Insulin Resistance and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Insulin sensitivity, with regard to glucose metabolism, improves rapidly
after beginning an energy-deficit diet before much weight loss occurs and
continues to improve with continued weight loss.22 In patients with obesity
and type 2 diabetes mellitus, a 5% weight loss at the end of 1 year of
dietary therapy can decrease fasting blood glucose, insulin, HbA1c
concentrations, and the dose of oral hypoglycemic therapy,23 whereas an
average weight loss of 30% in extremely obese patients with diabetes after
gastric bypass surgery resulted in normalization of blood glucose and glycosylated
hemoglobin concentrations in 83% of patients.24 Weight loss can also prevent
the development of new diabetes in high-risk persons who are overweight
or obese.25–28Lifestyle dietary and activity modifications, which resulted
in modest (5%) weight loss, decreased the 4- to 6-year
cumulative incidence of diabetes by 50% in men andwomen who were overweight
or obese and had impaired glucose tolerance.25,26 The Swedish Obese Subjects
(SOS) Study demonstrated that greater weight losses (16% of body weight)
induced by gastric surgery in patients who are
extremely obese (initial BMI of 41 kg/m2) were associated
with a 5-fold decrease in the cumulative incidence of diabetes for 8 years.27
Dyslipidemia
Weight loss decreases serum LDL-C and triglyceride concentrations,
whereas increases in serum HDL-C typically are seen when weight loss is
sustained.1,29,30 The greatest relative improvements in serum triglyceride
and LDL-C usually occur within the first 2 months of weight loss.31 The
beneficial effects on serum lipids are related to the percentage of weight
lost, and regaining the lost weight leads to a relapse in serum concentrations.
A sustained weight loss of 5% is needed tomaintain a decrease in serum
triglyceride concentrations, whereas serum total and LDL-C revert toward
baseline if a 10% diet-induced weight loss is not maintained.31,32 Incontrast,
data from the SOS study showed that an average weight loss of 33% at 2
years after bariatric surgery decreased serum triglyceride concentrations
and increased serum HDL-C concentrations, but it did not affect serum total
cholesterol.2
Hypertension
Weight loss decreases both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in
a dose-dependent fashion; therefore, greater weight loss is generally associated
with greater improvement in blood pressure.33,34 Weight regain results
in a steady increase in blood pressure toward baseline. The results of
retrospective analyses of large surgical group experiences showed that
marked weight loss induced by gastric surgery improved or completely resolved
hypertension in 67% ofpatients.35,36 In contrast, data from the SOS study
revealed that on average blood pressure began to progressively increase
2 years after surgery.27 Most subjects enrolled in the SOS study underwent
vertical banded gastroplasty or gastric banding procedures and lost less
weight than those who underwent gastric bypass. Subjects who had gastric
bypass surgery maintained a decrease in both systolic and diastolic blood
pressure for 5 years after surgery.37 Diet-induced weight loss can prevent
the development of hypertension in persons who are obese. The results from
large epidemiological studies and intervention trials suggest that the
risk of developing hypertension in normotensive women is inversely correlated
with changes in body weight.33,38 Data from the SOS study showed, however,
that the beneficial effect of gastric surgery-induced weight loss in preventing
new cases of hypertension disappeared 3 years after surgery, despite persistent
weight loss.27
Pulmonary disease
Obesity is associated with altered pulmonary function. A marked excess
in abdominal fat mass can mechanically interfere with lung function because
of the increased weight on the chest wall and thoracic cage. In addition,
obesity is associated with serious pulmonary diseases, obstructive sleep
apnea (OSA), and obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS). OSA is characterized
by multiple episodes of apnea and hypopnea during sleep caused by partial
or complete upper airway obstruction. The interruption in nighttime sleep
and hypoxemia causes daytime sleepiness and cardiopulmonary dysfunction.
Episodes of oxygen desaturation during apnea and hypopnea cause transient
increases in pulmonary artery and pulmonary wedge pressures, and myocardial
perfusion defects.39 Over time, electrocardiographic abnormalities and
cardiac rhythm alterations, permanent pulmonary hypertension, right ventricle
hypertrophy, and bilateral leg edema can develop.40–42 OHS is caused by
a decreased ventilatory response to
hypercapnia, hypoxia, or hypercapnia and hypoxia and inadequate respiratory
muscle strength to meet the increased ventilatory demand caused by the
mechanical effects of obesity. Patients with OHS have shallow and inefficient
breathing, and a pCO2 50 mm Hg. Patients may become more symptomatic when
lying down because abdominal pressure pushes up the diaphragm, which increases
intrathoracic pressure and reduces respiratory capacity. Pickwickian syndrome
is a severe form of OHS and is associated with extreme obesity, irregular
breathing, cyanosis, somnolence, and right ventricular dysfunction.
Inflammation
Obesity is associated with an increase in circulating inflammatory
markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP)43–45 and cytokines (ie, interleukin-6
[IL-6], IL-18, and P-selectin). 46–49 Adipose tissue itself is a likely
source of these excess cytokines,46,50 and IL-6 stimulates the production
of
CRP by the liver.51 The increase in inflammatory markers is associated
with insulin resistance52–56 and is an important predictor of atherosclerotic
events.57–61 Data from studies that have ranged in duration from 3 months
to 2 years have revealed that weight reduction decreases plasma CRP concentration.49,52,62–67
The decrease in CRP is directly related to the amount of weight loss, fat
mass, and change in waist circumference. In one study, only subjects who
were insulin resistant experienced a weight loss–induced decrease in CRP,
an effect that paralleled changes in insulin sensitivity.52 Plasma CRP
concentrations did not decrease and insulin sensitivity did not increase
in subjects who were insulin sensitive before weight reduction. Decreases
in plasma IL-6,48,49,65,67–69 IL-18,49,67 P-selectin,48 and tumor necrosis
factor-48 concentrations have also been reported66,68,69 after weight
loss in subjects who are obese.
Autonomic Nervous System Dysfunction
Overweight and obesity are associated with cardiac autonomic neuropathy.
For example, a 10% increase in body weight is associated with a decline
in parasympathetic tone and an increase in heart rate.70 Alterations in
autonomic nervous system function might be an important cause of cardiovascular
disease events and mortality, as suggested by the relationship between
heart rate and cardiovascular disease mortality.71,72 Marked weight loss
induced by bariatric surgery increases vagal activity.73 In addition, weight
loss achieved by dieting also increases cardiac parasympathetic activity,74–77
but this increase is not maintained in the absence of sustained weight
loss.77
Cardiovascular disease
Although weight loss modifies many cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk
factors, it is not known whether weight reduction decreases CVD events
or CVD mortality in obese persons. 78–80 This important question has not
yet been answered because it is difficult to achieve prolonged periods
of sustained weight reduction (eg, 5 years) with nonsurgicaltherapy81
and to perform prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving
bariatric surgery. Data from the SOS study showed that despite a greater
reduction in weight and CVD risk factors after surgical than medical therapy
for obesity, no difference in cardiovascular disease events or mortality
was found at 10 years.82 Data from large population studies have revealed
that obesity is associated with increased CVD mortality.83–87 Moreover,
CVD death rates are directly related to BMI in both men and women. The
risk of CVD mortality in obese persons who have a BMI 35 kg/m2 was 2 to
3 times the riskamong lean persons (BMI 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2),88 and a 30%
higher CHD mortality rate occurs for every 5-unit increment of BMI.89 In
addition, overweight in adolescence is associated with a 130% increased
risk of CHD mortality in adulthood.90 In general, data from large epidemiological
studies have shown that weight variability is associated with an increased
rate of CVD mortality.91 The interpretation of the results from these studies
is complicated because many studies assessed
weight variability rather than weight loss, included large numbers
of lean and mildly overweight subjects, and included subjects who experienced
“unintentional” weight loss, which may have been caused by diseases that
influence mortality. Therefore, the available data are not adequate to
reliably
determine whether intentional weight loss affects CVD mortality, and
carefully designed RCTs are needed to address this issue.
Cardiovascular Structure and Function
Obesity, particularly severe obesity, is associated with abnormalities
in cardiac structure and function.8,92 The severity of these defects is
associated with both the degree and duration of obesity.93 Obesity is associated
with an increase in total blood volume and cardiac output and a decrease
in peripheral vascular resistance.8,94 In this setting, ventricular filling
pressures are elevated,95 which eventually results in increased wall stress,
diastolic dysfunction, and left ventricular hypertrophy. 93,96,98 Abnormalities
of the right heart can also occur and may represent a combination of left
heart disease, recurrent pulmonary thromboemboli, and OSA or hypoventilation
or both.99 Finally, lipomatous deposition in the interatrial septum has
also been described100; however, this anatomic alteration is unlikely to
contribute to cardiac dysfunction. Weight loss, particularly in persons
who are severely obese, can improve cardiac structure and function.3,101
Improvements in fractional shortening are associated with decreases in
hypertension and left ventricular internal dimension with reduced atrial
and left ventricular free and septal wall thickness. Moreover, improvements
in left ventricular
diastolic filling and ejection fraction also occur.102 Improvements
in left ventricular mass occur in both normotensive and hypertensive patients
and are independent of the reduction in blood pressure.103,104 In addition,
adding exercise to a lowcalorie diet (LCD) may produce greater benefits
in cardiac structure105,106; however, these benefits are not consistent
across all studies.107,108 For example, substantial weight loss (15% of
baseline)108 and modest weight loss plus physical training109 did not have
beneficial cardiac effects in obese adolescents. At present, the potential
benefits of weight loss on cardiac function are not completely clear and
require further study.
Clinical efficacy of obesity therapies
The goals of obesity therapy include decreasing body fat to improve
appearance, physical function, quality of life, and medical health. Although
surgical removal of large amounts of subcutaneous adipose tissue (20%
of total body fat mass) can improve a person’s appearance, ability to ambulate,
and
quality of life, it does not improve the metabolic CHD risk factors
associated with obesity110; it seems that fat loss induced by negative
energy balance is necessary to achieve metabolic benefits. Current therapies
available for weight management that cause weight loss by inducing a negative
energy balance include dietary intervention, physical activity, pharmacotherapy,
and surgery. Behavior modification to enhance dietary and activity compliance
is an important component of all of these treatments.
Dietary intervention
Many different diets have been proposed for the treatment of obesity.
These dietary approaches vary in their total energy prescription, macronutrient
(fat, carbohydrate, and protein) content, energy density, glycemic index,
and portion control. The energy content of a diet is the primary determinant
of
weight loss. Very-low-calorie diets (VLCDs) provide 800kcal/d, LCDs
usually contain 800 to 1500 kcal/d, and a balanced-deficit diet usually
provides 1500 kcal/d. An LCD usually causes an 8% loss of body weight
at 6 months ftreatment. The results from clinical trials may not reflect
the experience in clinical practice because these trials involved subjects
who volunteered for a weight loss study and often included formal behavior
modification as part of the study protocol. The use of a VLCD usually produces
a weight loss of 15% to 20% within 4 months111–113; however, VLCDs are
associated with poorer weight loss maintenance and a greater weight regain
than are LCDs, so weight loss at 1 year after treatment with a VLCD does
not differ from treatment with an LCD.113 In addition, treatment with a
VLCD may be particularly problematic for patients with CHD because of the
risk of diet-induced hypokalemia, dehydration, and gallstones. The macronutrient
composition of a diet does not affect the rate of weight loss unless macronutrient
manipulation influences total energy intake or expenditure. The Expert
Panel on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and
Obesity in Adults convened by the National Institutes of Health/National
Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute recommended a 500- to 1000-kcal/d deficit
diet for obese persons, which will initially result in a weekly weight
loss of 1 to 2 lb (0.45 to 0.9 kg). It is often difficult, however, to
accurately determine a patient’s daily energy requirements. Therefore,
calorie-intake guidelines for a weight-loss diet have been suggested based
on a patient’s initial body weight (Table 1).114 The calorie content of
any prescribed diet must be adjusted regularly, based on the patient’s
weight-loss response and treatment goals. A low-fat diet is considered
the standard approach for the treatment of obesity.1 Data from diet intervention
studies
support the notion that decreasing fat intake, even while allowing
ad libitum intake of carbohydrates and proteins, causes a spontaneous decrease
in total energy intake and weight loss.115 In addition, a survey of obese
persons who were successful at maintaining long-term weight loss found
that they consumed 25% of calories from fats.116 However, a recent
systematic review of randomized controlled studies that were specifically
conducted to evaluate dietary therapy for obesity found that weight loss
induced by low-fat diets and other weight-reducing diets were similar.117
The composite of these data suggests that low-fat diets can enhance weight
loss and may be particularly useful in selected persons, but they are not
necessarily more effective than LCDs. The use of low-carbohydrate diets
has become increasingly popular. Several RCTs compared the effect of lowcarbohydrate,
high-protein, high-fat diets (eg, the Atkins diet) with a conventional
low-fat diet (30% energy from fats) inadults118–123 or a very-low-fat
diet (12% energy from fats) in adolescents.124 In all studies, weight
loss at 3 and 6 months in subjects randomized to the low-carbohydrate diet
was 2 times as great (4- to 5-kg greater weight loss) as thoserandomized
to the low-fat group. In 2 studies that observed
patients for 1 year, weight loss at 1 year was not significantly different
between groups, however.121,122 In general, these studies also found the
low-carbohydrate diet was more beneficial in serum triglyceride and HDL-C
concentrations as compared with the low-fat diet, but the low-fat diet
was more beneficial in serum LDL-C concentration. Although these changes
in triglycerides and HDL-C after weight reduction on low-carbohydrate diets
appear favorable, it is not known whether these alterations are associated
with long-term beneficial effects on CHD.125 The type of carbohydrate consumed
also may be involved in regulating energy intake, and a low glycemic index
diet has been proposed as a treatment for obesity. The glycemic index refers
to the increase in blood glucose that occurs after consuming a fixed amount
(usually 50 g) of available carbohydrate from a test food relative to the
increase in blood glucose that occurs after consuming the same amount of
available carbohydrate from either glucose or white bread.126,127 Most
refined grain products and potatoes have a high glycemic index, whereas
most fruits, legumes, and nonstarchy vegetables have a low glycemic index.
The glycemic response to a specific food that is ingested as part of a
meal can be altered by many factors, such as the method of
preparation and the effect of concomitantly ingested foods on
TABLE 1. Suggested Energy and Macronutrient Composition of
Initial Reduced-Calorie Diet
Body Weight, lb
Suggested Energy
Intake, kcal/d
150–199 1000
200–249 1200
250–299 1500
300–349 1800
350 2000
Klein et al Clinical Implications of Obesity 2955
intestinal motility. Data from a small (n14) randomizedcontrolled
1-year trial conducted in overweight adolescents revealed that a reduced
glycemic index diet resulted in a greater decrease in body weight and BMI
than did a reduced-fat diet.128 The writing group is unaware of any RCTs
evaluating the effect of a low glycemic index diet on body weight in adults.
The use of low-energy-density foods may be another effective approach for
treating obesity. The energy density of a diet is defined as the calories
present in a given weight of food. A food’s energy density is directly
correlated with its
fat content and inversely correlated with its water content. Energy
intake during a meal is partially regulated by the weight of ingested food
and is inversely correlated with energy density.129 Moreover, the results
of a 6-month RCT demonstrated that providing subjects with ad libitum low-fat
and low-energy-density foods causes modest (1% to 2%) weight loss.130
Portion control is an important aspect of reducing energy intake. During
ad libitum feeding, a direct relationship is found between portion size
served and intake; therefore, increasing the size of the portion served
increases the amount of food consumed.131 Providing prepackaged prepared
meals, either as frozen entrees of mixed foods or liquid-formula meal replacements
improves portion control and can enhance weight loss. Data from RCTs
have shown that obese persons who were given prepackaged prepared meals
or liquid-formula meal replacements lost several kilograms more weight
than did those who were randomized to a standard diet.132–134 Educating
patients about food labels, recipe modification, restaurant ordering, social
eating, and healthy cooking methods are also important to help patients
understand portion size and energy intake during meals and snacks. In summary,
the data from RCTs demonstrate that different dietary interventions can
cause short-term weight loss. At the present time, we suggest that patients
who are overweight or obese and trying to lose weight consume a diet that
induces an energy deficit of 500 to 1000 kcal/d and has a macronutrient
composition that is known to reduce the risk of CVD. This diet involves
(1) consuming a variety of fruits, vegetables, grains, low-fat or nonfat
dairy products, fish, legumes, poultry, and lean meats; (2) limiting intake
of foods that are high in saturated fat, trans-fatty acids, and cholesterol;
and (3) following the current dietary guidelines of the American Heart
Association135 and the NCEP ATP III18 (Table 2). These recommendations
may require modification, based on the results of ongoing and future dietary
therapy studies. The key to successful weight management is to provide
patients with a dietary regimen that results in long-term compliance. The
available data suggest that it is unlikely that one approach is appropriate
for all patients.
Physical activity
Regular physical activity has important health benefits. A consensus
public health recommendation for physical activity developed in the mid-1990s
proposed that sedentary adults should accumulate 30 minutes of at least
moderate-intensity physical activity (eg, brisk walking) on most but preferably
all days of the week.136–138 The health benefits of 30 minutes of daily
moderate-intensity physical activity apply to all persons. Data from several
studies show that persons who are overweight or obese and physically active
(ie, participate in 30 minutes of moderate-intensity physical
activity most days of the week) or who have moderate to high levels
of cardiorespiratory fitness (ie, in the upper four fifths of the age and
sex fitness distributions) have much lower death rates from cardiovascular
disease and all-cause mortality than people who are sedentary and unfit.87,139–143
Therefore, regular physical activity may improve survival in persons who
are overweight or obese, independent of weight loss. Weight loss results
from a negative energy balance, which can be achieved by decreasing energy
intake, increasing energy expenditure, or both. It is usually much easier
to
induce a daily energy deficit by restricting energy intake than by
increasing energy expenditure. The calories consumed during physical activity
can be estimated as a function of a metabolic equivalent task (MET) score.
One MET is the energy consumed during resting conditions, such as television
viewing, and is equal to 1 kcal/kg of body weight per hour. Other
activities such as carrying packages, doing housework or gardening (2 to
5 METs), walking at a pace of 3 to 4 mph (3 to 4 METs), and jogging (8
to 10 METs) consume greater amounts of energy. A person weighing 90 kg
would need to walk briskly for 4 to 5 h/d to increase his or her energy
expenditure above resting metabolic rate by an amount that is equivalent
to reducing energy intake by 750 to 1000 kcal/d. Therefore, it is difficult
to lose a substantial amount of weight through physical activity. A review
of 19 studies with randomized designs showed that exercise plus diet caused
a 0.1-kg/wk greater weight loss than did diet alone.144 Weight loss induced
by combining physical activity with diet decreases the loss of FFM that
occurs when weight loss is induced by diet alone.145 Data from observational
studies strongly support the notion that physical activity is critical
for preventing weight regain. 145,146 Moreover, the available evidence
suggests that a high volume of physical activity, 80 to 90 minutes of moderate-intensity
activity such as walking or 35 minutes of vigorous activity such as jogging,
is necessary to maintain weight loss.145 The interpretation of the results
from these
TABLE 2. Suggested Dietary Nutrient Composition for
Patients Who Are Overweight or Obese Nutrient Recommended Intake
Saturated fat1,2 7% of total calories
Monounsaturated fat 20% of total calories
Polyunsaturated fat 10% of total calories
Total fat 25% to 35% or less of total calories
Carbohydrate3 50% to 60% or more of total calories (complex carbohydrates
from a variety of vegetables, fruits, whole grains)
Fiber 20–30 g/d
Protein 15% of total calories
Cholesterol 200 mg/d
studies is complicated because subjects who achieved successful long-term
weight loss had chosen to be physically active and had not been randomized
a priori to a high-volume physical activity program. Data from a recent
prospective RCT revealed that high-volume physical activity did not
completely prevent weight regain.147 Nonetheless, weight regain after
6 months was smaller and total weight loss was greater at 12 and 18 months
in obese subjects who were randomized to dietary and behavior therapy plus
high-volume physical activity (2500 kcal of energy expenditure per week)
than they were in persons randomized to dietary and behavior therapy
plus conventional physical activity (1000 kcal of energy expenditure per
week). Although it is in general difficult to achieve long-term adherence
to an exercise program, several approaches have been used to enhance adoption
and maintenance of physical activity. Behavior-intervention strategies
originally developed for smoking cessation or dietary programs have been
used to increase physical activity. One study showed comparable improvements
over 24 months in activity, fitness, and CHD risk factors for participants
who were randomly assigned to a traditionally structured gymnasium-based
program or to a behaviorally based intervention.148 Increased contact by
mail
or telephone also helps maintain long-term adherence to exercise.149
Total exercise time during the course of a study is greater when daily
exercise is divided into multiple short bouts (eg, 10-minute bouts 3 to
4 times per day) than one long bout (eg, 30- to 40-minute bout once per
day)150; ie, multiple short bouts of exercise result in greater adherence
to an exercise program. In addition, many patients may be more compliant
with an exercise program conducted at home than at a health club because
fewer barriers are found with home-based exercise, including costs and
travel time. Developing a home-based walking program and using home exercise
equipment such as a treadmill has been shown to improve exercise adherence
and long-term weight loss.151,152 Finally, exercise does not need to be
a structured activity. Altering daily lifestyle activities (eg, walking
instead of
riding, using stairs instead of escalators/elevators) may make it easier
to increase overall physical activity than would participation in programmed
exercise. In one study, weight loss was similar after dietary therapy plus
either lifestyle activity or programmed exercise, but a trend toward better
maintenance of weight loss 1 year after treatment was observed in individuals
randomized to lifestyle activity than to programmed exercise.153 Although
these strategies are a welcome improvement, all studies still report a
decline in exercise adherence over time.148,149,151,154 In summary, physical
activity is not an effective approach for achieving initial weight loss,
but it does have beneficial effects on fitness and obesity-related complications
such as CHD and diabetes. In addition, a high level of regular physical
activity is important for preventing and attenuating
weight regain after diet-induced weight loss. Most data suggest that
it is the total volume of physical activity that is important to weight
management and that it does not matter whether the activity is of moderate
or vigorous intensity, a lifestyle or structured program, or taken in a
single bout each
day or in several intermittent bouts.
Behavior Modification
Behavior therapy focuses on analyzing and modifying eating and activity
behaviors that increase body weight and provides techniques to help patients
change their lifestyle habits and overcome barriers to compliance. A summary
of behavioral strategies for treating obesity is shown in Table 3. The
most important principles of behavioral treatment are that it (1) is goal-oriented
and specifies goals that can be easily attained and measured, (2) is process-oriented
and helps patients develop realistic goals and a reasonable plan for reaching
those goals, and (3) involves making small rather than large changes so
that incremental steps are taken to achieve larger and more distant goals.155,156
Self-monitoring, the systematic observation and recording of target behaviors,
is the cornerstone of behavioral treatment. 156 Self-monitoring tools include
(1) food diaries in which to record food intake, including types, amounts,
energy contents, and times, places, and feelings associated with eating
(usually in paper-and-pencil format but also available on the Internet
or in commercially available programs for use on a personal digital assistant),
(2) physical activity logs in which to record the frequency, duration,
and intensity of exercise or step counters on which to monitor the daily
steps
TABLE 3. Behavioral Strategies to Improve Weight Management
Strategy Description
Self-monitoring Record “what, where, and when” of eating and physical
activity to increase patients’ awareness of their own behavior.
Goal setting Set specific short-term targets in eating and exercise
habits to achieve incremental improvements.
Stimulus control Identify triggers associated with poor eating and
physical activity behaviors, and design strategies to break link.
Cognitive restructuring Change perceptions, thoughts, or beliefs undermining
weight control efforts, and help patients develop realistic expectations
about weight loss.
Problem solving Analyze situations preventing maintenance of a healthier
lifestyle and identify possible solutions to problems; maintain philosophy
that planning, not willpower, is key to weight management.
Relapse prevention Develop skills based on premise that lapses in weight
control behavior can be anticipated in certain situations (eg, travel,
celebrations, bad mood).
Stress management
Decrease psychological stress to prevent dysfunctional eating.
Contingency management Use rewards (tangible or verbal) to increase
performance of specific behaviors or when specified goals reached.
Social support Use assistance from family members and friends in modifying
lifestyle behaviors.
Ongoing contact Maintain visits, telephone calls, or Internet communication
with physician and office staff or other healthcare professionals to promote
adherence with recommended lifestyle changes.
taken, and (3) weight scales on which to measure changes in body weight.
Self-monitoring increases patients’ awareness of their behaviors, generates
records that can be reviewed by healthcare professionals, and provides
targets for intervention. In clinical practice, formal behavior therapy
can be provided through group sessions or individual meetings with a healthcare
professional who is skilled in the delivery of behavioral techniques used
to modify lifestyle habits.155,157 If possible, contact should be regular,
preferably once every 1 to 2 weeks, during the initial 6-month phase of
a treatment program.155 Comprehensive group behavior therapy, in conjunction
with diet and physical activity, usually results in an 9% body weight
loss within 26 weeks of treatment (0.5kg/week).157 Patients usually regain
33% of their lost weight in the year after ending behavior therapy, but
most still maintain a weight loss of 5% at the end of 1 year.Providing
ongoing contact by scheduled visits, telephone calls, food evaluation and
exercise diaries, and Internet communication can enhance long-term adherence
and helps prevent weight regain.158,159 In addition, Internet-based treatment
programs for weight loss160,161 and structured commercial programs such
as Weight Watchers162 can augment the professional guidance provided by
the physician.
Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacotherapy can help selected patients lose weight. The approved
indications for drug therapy for obesity are a BMI 30 kg/m2 or a BMI between
27 and 29.9 kg/m2 in conjunctionwith an obesity-related medical complication
in patients with no contraindications for therapy. Effective pharmacotherapy
for obesity is likely to require long-term, if not lifelong, treatment
because patients who respond to drug therapy usually regain weight when
the therapy is stopped. The expected length of drug treatment of obese
patients who respond to therapy makes it important to carefully consider
the long-term risks of being obese, the beneficial effects of pharmacotherapy
on body weight and obesity-associated diseases, and the side effects and
costs of treatment before beginning therapy. In addition, pharmacotherapy
alone is not as effective as pharmacotherapy given in conjunction with
a
comprehensive weight-management program.163 Therefore, patients given
drug treatment without the other standard approaches to weight management,
including behavior modification, diet education, and activity counseling,
are exposed to all of the risks of drug treatment without all of the medical
benefits. Drug therapy adds a level of complexity to the treatment of obesity.
The patient with medication prescribed for obesity may have comorbidities
that already require pharmacotherapy, thereby increasing the likelihood
of nonadherence.164 Strategies to enhance medication compliance include
regularly assessing adherence and response to therapy, counseling about
and reinforcing the importance of adherence, simplifying
the treatment regimen, assisting the patient in reducing barriers to
adherence, providing reminders and cues to facilitate improved adherence,
and enlisting support when needed.159,164 –166 In addition, weight loss
drugs usually are not covered by health insurance or health care plans,
so a
considerable economic incentive exists for the obese patient to discontinue
taking these medications. Medications for the treatment of obesity available
in the United States are listed in Table 4. Effective therapy for obesity
usually requires chronic intervention; however, only 2 drugs, sibutramine
and orlistat, are approved for long-term use.
Sibutramine
Pharmacology : sibutramine is a -phenethylamine derivative that blocksthe
reuptake of norepinephrine, sibutramine, and, to a lesser degree, dopamine.
Sibutramine decreases food intake by producing early satiety during feeding
and by delaying initiation of the next meal. Although sibutramine has no
potential for abuse, it is classified as a Schedule IV drug. Sibutramine
is available in 5-, 10-, and 15-mg doses; 10 mg/d as a single daily dose
is the recommended starting level, with titration up or down based on response.
Doses 15 mg/d are not recommended.
Clinical Efficacy
In a 1-year RCT, subjects treated with sibutramine lost 7% of their
initial body weight and those treated with placebo lost 2%. Of the subjects
treated with sibutramine or placebo, 57% and 20%, respectively, lost 5%
of their initial body weight;34% and 7%, respectively, lost 10% of their
initial body weight.167 Weight loss with intermittent sibutramine therapy
(15 mg/d given during weeks 1 through 12, 19 through 30, and 37 through
48, and placebo given during the two 6-week periods when sibutramine was
withdrawn) was equivalent to weight loss with continuous sibutramine therapy
(15 mg/d).168 Sibutramine therapy also has been shown to maintain weight
loss for 12 to 18 months in subjects who initially lost weight by eating
a VLCD163 or who successfully lost weight after 6 months of sibutramine
treatment.170 The use of sibutramine in obese patients with either medication-controlled
hypertension171 or type 2 diabetes mellitus172causes greater weight loss
than with placebo therapy, but the overall weight loss is less than that
observed in studies conducted in subjects who do not have comorbid disease.
Weight loss with sibutramine therapy is more effective
when combined with behavior and dietary therapies. In a 1-year RCT,
weight loss with sibutramine therapy alone was 5 kg, with sibutramine
therapy plus behavior modification was 10 kg, and with sibutramine therapy
plus behavior modification and a structured meal plan was 15 kg.173
Side Effects and Safety
The most common side effects of sibutramine are dry mouth, constipation,
and insomnia. Sibutramine increases
TABLE 4. Drugs Approved by FDA for Treating Obesity
Generic Name
DEA
Schedule
Orlistat None
Sibutramine hydrochloride IV
Phentermine IV
Diethylpropion hydrochloride IV
Benzphetamine hydrochloride III
Phendimetrazine tartrate III
DEA indicates Drug Enforcement Agency.
2958 Circulation November 2, 2004
heart rate (a dose of 10 to 15 mg/d causes an increase in heart rate
of 4 to 6 bpm) usually in the first few weeks of treatment and lasts as
long as the drug is taken. Sibutramine also causes a dose-related increase
in blood pressure (a dose of 10 to 15 mg/d causes an average increase in
systolic and diastolic blood pressure of 2 to 4 mm Hg) and can prevent
weight loss–induced decrease in blood pressure.155 Therefore, careful monitoring
is needed when combining sibutramine with other drugs that can increase
blood pressure. Sibutramine should not be used in patients who have uncontrolled
hypertension, a history of coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure,
cardiac arrhythmias, or stroke, or who are being treated with
monoamine oxidase inhibitors or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
CVD Risk Factors
The composite data from RCTs demonstrate that sibutramine causes improvements
in serum triglyceride, total cholesterol, LDL-C, and HDL-C concentrations
that are directly related to the magnitude of the weight loss. However,
sibutramine therapy decreases or eliminates weight loss–
induced benefits on blood pressure.
Orlistat
Pharmacology
Orlistat blocks the digestion and absorption of dietary fat by binding
to intestinal lipases.174 The percentage of fat that is malabsorbed is
related to drug dose in a curvilinear fashion.175 Near-maximal fat malabsorption
occurs at a dose of 120 mg when given with a meal, which causes malabsorption
of 30% of fat ingested from a meal that contains 30of energy as fat.
Less than 1% of ingested orlistat is absorbed;
therefore, it has no effect on systemic lipases.176
Clinical Efficacy
The effects of orlistat on body weight and CHD risk factors have been
evaluated in a large number of RCTs. The data from most studies demonstrate
that at 1 year, subjects who were randomized to orlistat therapy (120 mg
tid) lost 8% to10% of their initial body weight and those randomized to
placebo therapy lost 4% to 6%.177–181 Approximately 33%more patients
treated with orlistat lost 5% of their bodyweight than did those treated
with placebo; 2 times as manypatients treated with orlistat lost 10%
of their body weightas did those treated with placebo. Ending orlistat
therapy
results in weight regain,177,180 and starting orlistat therapy after
successful diet-induced weight loss helps maintain body weight.182 In subjects
with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus who are treated with sulfonylureas,183
metformin,184 or insulin,185 the percentage who achieve a 5% or 10% reduction
in body weight is 2 to 3 times higher in those receiving orlistat plus
dietary therapy than it is in those receiving dietary therapy alone. The
overall weight loss effect of orlistat therapy in patients with diabetes
is less than that reported in previous studies of obese patients who did
not
have diabetes, however. Recently, the results of a 4-year RCT were
reported.28 The lowest body weight was achieved during the first year and
was greater in the orlistat-treated group (11% weight loss) than in
the placebo-treated group (6% weight loss). Subjects regained weight during
the remainder of the trial; orlistattreated subjects had lost 6.9% of their
initial body weight and placebo-treated subjects had lost 4.1% at the end
of 4 years. Orlistat therapy also decreased the cumulative 4-year incidence
of type 2 diabetes mellitus by 37%. Side Effects and Safety About 70% to
80% of subjects treated with orlistat experienced 1 gastrointestinal event
as compared with50% to 60% of those treated with placebo. Gastrointestinal
events usually occurred early (within the first 4 weeks), were of mild
or moderate intensity, were usually limited to 1 or 2 episodes, and resolved
despite continued orlistat treatment. Approximately 4% of subjects treated
with orlistat and 1% of subjects treated with placebo withdrew from the
studies because of gastrointestinal complaints. During treatment, small
decreases in plasma fat-soluble vitamins, particularly vitamins A, D, and
E, can
occur, although plasma concentrations almost always remain within the
reference range. A few patients, however, may experience decreases in plasma
vitamin concentrations to below the reference range. Because it is impossible
to determine a priori which patients will need vitamin supplements, it
is recommended that all patients who are treated with orlistat be given
a daily multivitamin supplement that is taken at a time when orlistat is
not being
ingested. Orlistat can have medically significant effects on the absorption
of lipophilic medications if both drugs are taken simultaneously. Subtherapeutic
plasma cyclosporin levels that occurred in organ transplant recipients
after they began orlistat therapy for obesity have been reported.186–189
Therefore, orlistat should not be taken for 2 hours before or afterthe
ingestion of lipophilic drugs, and plasma drug concentrations should be
followed to ensure appropriate dosing. Orlistat does not affect the absorption
of selected drugs with a narrow therapeutic index (warfarin, digoxin, phenytoin)
and selected drugs that are likely to be taken concomitantly with orlistat
(glyburide, oral contraceptives, furosemide, captopril, nifedipine, and
atenolol).189CVD Risk Factors Because of its weight loss effects, orlistat
therapy improves all major cardiovascular disease risk factors such
as blood pressure and insulin sensitivity. Moreover, data from several
RCTs suggest that orlistat has a beneficial effect on serum cholesterol
concentrations that is independent of weight loss alone. Subjects given
orlistat had a greater reduction in serum LDL-C concentrations than
those given placebo, even after adjusting for percentage of weight
loss.178,179 The mechanism responsible for this additional lipid-lowering
effect may be related to the effect of orlistat in blocking both dietary
cholesterol and triglyceride absorption.190 In contrast, orlistat is not
as effective in lowering serum triglyceride concentrations, presumably
because it increases the proportion of absorbed energy derived from carbohydrate,
which tends to increase serum triglycerides.191
Phentermine
Phentermine is a -phenethylamine derivative that stimulatesthe release
of norepinephrine and dopamine from nerve terminals. Although phentermine
is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for long-term
use, it is the most commonly prescribed anorexiant medication in the United
States,192 presumably because it is less expensive than sibutramine. Phentermine
was approved by the FDA 30 years ago, when the criteria needed for approval
were less rigorous than they are currently. Therefore, fewer studies have
evaluated the efficacy and safety Klein et al Clinical Implications of
Obesity 2959 of phentermine therapy than have evaluated sibutramine and
orlistat. Only one long-term (36 weeks) RCT evaluated the effect of phentermine
therapy on body weight.193 In that study, obese women were randomized to
dietary therapy and treatment with daily phentermine, daily phentermine
every other month alternating with daily placebo every other month, or
daily placebo. Of the 108 enrolled subjects, approximately two thirds completed
the study; among those who completed the study, the groups that received
either continuous or intermittent phentermine therapy lost 13% of their
initial weight as compared with a 5% weight loss in the placebo group.
Side Effects and Safety
The most common side effects of phentermine are dry mouth, insomnia,
and constipation. Although all sympathomimetic agents can increase blood
pressure and heart rate, these side effects are uncommon when weight loss
is adequate.
Herbal Products
Several different dietary supplements and herbal preparations have
been used to treat obesity, including chromium picolinate, garcinia cambogia
as a source of hydroxycitrate, chitosan that is claimed to reduce fat absorption,
phenylephrine from Citrus aurantium (bitter orange), and ma huang as a
source of ephedra alkaloids with or without guarana as a source of
caffeine. In general, few RCTs have evaluated the clinical efficacy of
these agents, and most of the RCTs that have been done were of substandard
quality194–196; however, data from several RCTs demonstrated greater weight
loss in subjects given herbal products that contain ephedra than in those
given placebo.197,198 Nonetheless, the sale of ephedra in over-the-counter
products was recently banned by the FDA because of concerns about serious
adverse cardiovascular effects.
Clinical Evaluation
The physician’s office should be an environment that is sensitive to
the needs of obese patients. The waiting room should contain chairs without
arms, large gowns and large blood pressure cuffs should be available, and
a scale that can weigh patients who weigh 300 lb should be available and
located in a private area. The initial assessment should include an
appropriate history, physical examination, and laboratory tests.
History
In addition to a standard medical interview, a patient’s history should
include an assessment of (1) weight history (highest and lowest adult body
weight, previous weight loss attempts, weight pattern, and potential triggers
and social and environmental factors that contributed to weight gain),
(2) dietary history, including an assessment of types and timing of meals
and snacks and an attempt to identify possible triggers that result in
excessive energy intake, (3) physical activity and function (daily and
exercise activities, physical limitations, effect of obesity on physical
ifestyle), (4) obesity-related health risk (age of onset and duration of
obesity, family history of obesity and obesity-related medical complications,
current obesity-related disease),
(5) possible psychiatric illnesses, such as binge eating disorder and
depression, that may require therapy before a weight loss program is initiated,
and (6) ability to lose weight (desire to lose weight, weight loss goals
and expectations, limitations for achieving weight loss, including medications
and illnesses, lifestyle and work patterns, financial resources, and special
needs).
Physical Examination
The patient’s BMI and waist circumference should be determined. BMI
is generally correlated with percentage of body fat in a curvilinear fashion.208
Some people with an “obese” BMI, who have a normal amount of body fat and
a large muscle mass, are not at increased risk for CHD, whereas people
with a “normal” BMI, who have excessive body fat and small muscle mass,
are at increased risk. Waist circumference, measured halfway between the
lastrib and the iliac crest, correlates with abdominal fat mass.5 Table
6 provides a classification of risk based on BMI. A waist circumference
of 88 cm (35 in) for women and102 cm (40 in) for men is associated with
an increasedrisk of metabolic diseases and CHD.1 Additional assessments
should include measuring blood pressure with a large cuff and searching
for physical signs of right or left ventricular dysfunction, congestive
heart failure, and pulmonary disease. An electronic stethoscope can increase
a physician’s ability to detect cardiac abnormalities in patients
who are extremely obese.
Laboratory Tests
An ECG is needed to check for evidence of CHD and to obtain a baseline
tracing for future comparisons. Standard blood tests should be performed
to search for CHD risk factors, including prediabetes (impaired fasting
blood glucose or impaired glucose tolerance), dyslipidemia (increased triglycerides,
low HDL-C, and increased LDL-C), and the metabolic syndrome. Additional
studies may be needed to further evaluate specific clinical suspicions
based on the history and physical examination, such as
TABLE 6. Weight Classification by BMI*
Obesity Class BMI, kg/m2 Disease Risk
Underweight 18.5 Increased
Normal 18.5–24.9 Normal
Overweight 25.0–29.9 Increased
Obesity I 30.0–34.9 High
II 35.0–39.9 Very high
Extreme Obesity III 40.0 Extremely high
*Data from Obes Res.1
Additional adiposity-related risk factors: waist circumference 40
(in men)
and 35 (in women); weight gain of 5 kg since age 18–20 y.
TABLE 7. Weight Loss Treatment Guidelines*
BMI Category, kg/m2
Treatment 25.0 –26.9 27.0 –29.9 30.0 –34.9 35.0 –39.9 40.0
Diet, physical activity, behavior therapy, or all 3 Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes
Pharmacotherapy† With obesity-related disease Yes Yes Yes
Surgery‡ With obesity-related disease Yes
*Data from Obes Res.1
†Pharmacotherapy should be considered only in patients who are not
able to achieve adequate weight loss by available conventional lifestyle
modifications and
who have no absolute contraindications for drug therapy.
‡Bariatric surgery should be considered only in patients who are unable
to lose weight with available conventional therapy and who have no absolute
contraindications for surgery.
Klein et al Clinical Implications of Obesity 2961
sleep studies to diagnose OHS or OSA and an exercise treadmill test
or electron beam computerized tomography scanning or both to evaluate CHD
risk. The comparative value of exercise tolerance testing and electron
beam computerized tomography in obese subjects has not been determined.
Exercise treadmill testing is not recommended for patients without cardiac
symptoms, and neither exercise treadmill testing nor electron beam computerized
tomography scanning should be performed in patients who are at low risk
for CHD, based on clinical judgment or Framingham risk score.209 –211
Therapeutic Options
Appropriate management requires identifying patients whoneed treatment,
developing a realistic treatment plan, and implementing a defined treatment
strategy that can be modified as needed during long-term surveillance.
The Practical Guide to the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of
Overweight and Obesity in Adults was developed by the North American Association
for the Study of Obesity in conjunction with the National Heart,
Lung, and Blood Institute.212 Suggested guidelines from the guide for
selecting among different weight loss treatment options, based on disease
risk, are shown in Table 7. A typical clinical consultation involves a
physician’s giving advice without adequate consideration of the patient’s
priorities, motivation, or confidence in undertaking change.213 In contrast,
obesity therapy should involve “patient-centered counseling,” which encourages
patients to set goals and express their own ideas for therapy, with input
from the healthcare professional. The treatment plan also must take into
account the patient’s readiness for therapy and the patient’s ability to
comply with the proposed treatment plan. Realistic goals should be established
and frequent follow-up visits should be scheduled to monitor progress,
modify the treatment plan as needed, and provide encouragement. Effective
therapy requires a longterm structured approach with continued support
from the physician and other caregivers, particularly during periods of
patient recidivism and weight regain. Reducing energy intake is the cornerstone
of weight management therapy. Providing appropriate nutrition counseling
and the behavior modification therapy needed to implement dietary changes
within the setting of a busy outpatient practice is difficult if not impossible
for most physicians because they do not have the time or expertise to provide
this kind of care. Therefore, referral to a reputable weight loss program
or experienced dietitian should be considered, if these resources are available.
Additional therapy with weight loss medications or bariatric surgery can
be useful in properly selected patientsref.
Prevention : in a typical US housing estate,
the only way to reach workplaces, shops and schools is by car. Many streets
lack pavements, and cycle paths are virtually unheard of. To really fight
the flab, US public-health officials are now realizing that they may have
to change the entire layout of towns. The suburban mansion and sport-utility
vehicle (SUV) may fulfil the American dream, they say, but it is taking
an unforeseen toll on health. One study from last year compared the health
of people living in foot-friendly city areas with that of those dwelling
in sprawling, car-dependent suburbs. People's average weight and level
of hypertension rose along with the degree of sprawl. And although purpose-built
recreation centres and parks are well intentioned, experts say that only
a fraction of people make the effort to use them. One seemingly obvious
way to eliminate people's dependence on cars is to design communities in
which shops, schools and workplaces are within walking distance of homes.
One community called Southern Village
in North Carolina, for example, is built to be more like a traditional
neighbourhood with pavements, trails and parks aplenty. Such solutions
may seem intuitive, but researchers point out that there is no evidence
that living in such communities actually stops people piling on the pounds.
Concerns about traffic, crime or other social factors can prevent people
from venturing outdoors. At present, for instance, many US local authorities
have zoning regulations that were originally designed to get people out
of polluted or unsafe cities into the countryside, and these prohibit the
construction of houses and businesses next door to one another. Some commentators
point out that the house-building, motor and road industries are not used
to considering public health in their plans, and are somewhat slow to change.
More studies showing the effectiveness of exercise-friendly communities
will help to convince policy-makers and industries of the importance of
health. The health institute has $3 million of funding for such research
next year and hopes to offer more in future years
Prognosis : yearly, around a quarter of
a million deaths in Europe and more than 2.5 million deaths worldwide are
weight-related, with cardiovascular disease as the leading cause
Web resources
Bibliography :
-
adipose tissue cancers
-
lipoma : a benign, soft, rubbery, encapsulated
tumor of adipose tissue, usually composed of mature fat cells; it generally
occurs as a solitary lesion in the subcutaneous tissue of the trunk, nucha,
or forearms but may occur in deeper soft tissues.
-
lipoma arborescens : an intraarticular tumor usually occurring as
a solitary lesion in the knee; it is characterized by numerous swollen
treelike synovial villous projections of fatty tissue, and may arise de
novo or be associated with disorders such as degenerative joint disease,
chronic rheumatoid arthritis, or previous traumatic injury.
-
lipoma capsulare : a fatty tumor due to increase of the fat in the
capsule of an organ.
-
epidural lipoma : an intraspinal lipoma on or outside the spinal
dura mater in the thoracic or lumbar region, often causing spinal cord
compression; Cushing's disease is a common
causes.
-
intermuscular lipoma : a slow-growing, infiltrating lesion composed
of mature fat cells, occurring in the deeper soft tissues between large
muscle groups, predominantly those of the thighs, shoulders, or arms of
middle-aged to older adults.
-
intradural lipoma : an intraspinal lipoma with components within
or beneath the dura mater of the spine or sacrum.
-
intramedullary lipoma : an intraspinal lipoma within the spinal
cord.
-
intramuscular lipoma : a lesion similar to intermuscular lipoma,
but occurring within muscle.
-
intraspinal lipoma : a lipoma within the spinal canal; it may exist
entirely within the canal or it may protrude and form part of a lipomyelomeningocele.
-
lipoma ossificans : an ossified lipoma.
-
spindle cell lipoma : a rare, benign, circumscribed, painless lesion
occurring in the dermis or subcutaneous tissue of the posterior neck or
shoulder, particularly in middle-aged or older males; it is characterized
by lipocytes, spindle cells, bundles of birefringent collagen, and a myxoid
stroma.
-
hibernoma / fetal lipoma / granular cell lipoma
: a rare, benign, encapsulated tumor of soft tissues, arising from vestiges
of brown fat resembling that in certain hibernating animal species; it
is a small, lobulated, nontender, tan to dark lesion occurring usually
on the mediastinum or intrascapular region of female adults, but also in
armpits and retroperitoneum. Cells are large with lipofuscin granules,
many mitochondria, and crystalline structures seen at TEM.
-
lipoma fibrosum / fibrolipoma : lipoma
containing an excess of fibrous tissue
-
telangiectatic lipoma / lipoma telangiectodes / angiolipoma
/ lipoma cavernosum : a lipoma containing clusters of thin-walled proliferating
blood vessels; it is frequently painful
-
lipoma sarcomatodes / liposarcoma
: a malignant mesenchymal tumor usually arising from the intermuscular
fascia, particularly in the upper thigh, and occurring predominantly in
male adults. It is derived from primitive or embryonal lipoblastic cells
which exhibit varying degrees of lipoblastic and/or lipomatous differentiation,
and is divided into several variant forms.
-
dedifferentiated liposarcoma : a highly malignant form in which
areas of well-differentiated liposarcoma coexist with areas of specific
or undifferentiated spindle cell sarcoma.
-
myxoid liposarcoma : the most common form of liposarcoma, characterized
by primitive mesenchymal cells in a mucopolysaccharide-rich ground substance
and a plexiform capillary network; lipoblasts may be scarce. It metastasizes
late, if at all.
-
pleomorphic liposarcoma : a highly undifferentiated and anaplastic
form with a high metastatic potential; it is characterized by many large
tumor giant cells and unusual lipoblasts with frequent, abnormal mitotic
figures.
-
round cell liposarcoma : a highly vascular form characterized by
small round to oval cells with fine vacuolated cytoplasm and dark central
nuclei and by occasional lipoblasts, which are commonly without mitotic
figures; it frequently metastasizes.
-
well-differentiated liposarcoma : a form resembling lipoma, having
adult type fat cells and sometimes bizarre, atypical lipoblasts, with infrequent
mitoses and tumor giant cells; it may be locally aggressive but rarely
metastasizes.
-
mixed tumors
-
lipohypertrophy : hypertrophy of subcutaneous
fat.
-
insulin lipohypertrophy :
localized hypertrophy of subcutaneous fat at insulin
injection sites caused by the lipogenic effect of insulin
-
lipodystrophy / lipoatrophy / lipodystrophia
: a group of conditions due to defective metabolism of fat, resulting in
the absence of subcutaneous fat.
-
localized lipodystrophy
-
injection sites
-
centrifugal lipodystrophy begins in abdomen, inguinal and axillary
areas in babies with age < 3; self-limiting after 8-10 years
-
partial lipodystrophy
-
congenital partial lipodystrophy
-
progressive
familial partial lipodystrophy (FPLD) / lipodystrophia progressiva
: a condition occurring especially in females in the first decade of life,
characterized by a symmetrical loss of subcutaneous fat, usually beginning
on the face and gradually extending to the chest, neck, back, and upper
extremities, giving the lower part of the body an apparent, and possibly
real, adiposity of the buttocks, thighs, and legs. Some affected patients
develop type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertriglyceridemia
,
and membranoproliferative
glomerulonephritis
-
Dunnigan variant :
Aetiology : missense mutations in exon
8 (most) or exon 11 lamin
A/C
Pathogenesis : apoptosis and degeneration
of adipocytes
Symptoms & signs : normal during childhood;
at puberty begins losing subcutaneous fat at limbs and trunk showing increased
muscle mass. Many patients accumulate excess fat on face, neck, and occasionally
axillae and labia majora, causing double chin, hump, and rounded face.
Liver steatosis not progressing to liver cirrhosis
Laboratory examinations : mild-moderate
insulin-resistance, decreased HDL-Ch, severe hypertriglyceridemia
-
Kobberling variant : loss of fat
in limbs with normal distribution in face, hypertriglyceridemia
and diabetes mellitus
-
variant with mandibuloacral
dysplasia : dwarfism, acute voice, mandibular and clavicular hypoplasia
-
acquired partial lipodystrophy
-
intestinal lipodystrophy
/ Whipple's disease

-
acquired partial lipodystrophy / Barraquer-Simons
syndrome
Pathogenesis : C3NeF
(90%) => activation of alternative pathway of complement cascade => cytolysis
of adipocytes expressing factor
D / adipsin
Symptoms & signs : fat depots at hips
and lower limbs, membranoproliferative
glomerulonephritis
,
autoimmune diseases (systemic
lupus erythematosus
,
autoimmune
gastritis
,
juvenile
dermatomyositis
,
rheumatoid
arthritis
,
celiac
disease
with dermatitis
herpetiformis
,
Sjogren's
syndrome
,
giant
cell arteritis
,
leukocytoclastic
vasculitis
)
-
after 18-24 months of assumption of HIV-1
protease inhibitors
;
stavudine-based regimens have a higher cumulative prevalence of lipoatrophy
than regimens based on zidovudine, abacavir, or tenofovir. Regimens based
on nelfinavir are associated with more rapid fat loss than efavirenz. In
general, thymidine-based nucleoside analogues have been most associated
with lipoatrophy and protease inhibitor drugs most associated with the
metabolic syndrome.
Pathogenesis : metabolic syndrome (dyslipidaemia,
insulin resistance, visceral adiposity)
Symptoms & signs : subcutaneous lipoatrophy
in face, trunk and limbs, with deposition in neck (Madelung's neck
: double chin and hump); hypertriglyceridemia
and diabetes mellitus
Therapy : treatment switching (from protease
inhibitors to non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors or abacavir),
and use of metformin and recombinant
human growth hormone
has led to some success with managing the metabolic manifestations and
local fat accumulations
Therapy : thigh fat transplantation into face
lasts 2-5 years, liposuction
or lipectomy
-
total lipodystrophy
-
congenital total lipodystrophy
-
progressive
total lipodystrophy / congenital generalized lipodystrophy (CGL) / Berardinelli-Seip
syndrome / lipoatrophic diabetes : a rare autosomal recessive disorder
seen mainly in females in infancy, characterized by
Aetiology : mutations in 1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate
O-acyltransferase-2 (AGPAT2) or in BSCL2
/ seipin; also mutations in InsR
,
b3-AR
,
fatty
acid binding protein 2 (FABP2), IGF-1R
,
IRS-1,
HSL,
leptin
,
PPARg
,
and CGL1
/ granzyme B
Symptoms & signs : generalized loss
of subcutaneous and extracutaneous adipose tissue associated with hepatomegaly,
hypoglycemia and insulin-resistant nonketotic diabetes, hyperlipemia, elevation
of the basal metabolic rate (due to hyperactivity or orthosympathetic nervous
system or to compensate excessive heat losses due to lack of adipose tissue),
accelerated somatic growth, advanced bone age, acanthosis
nigricans
,
umbilical hernia or raised umbilicus, liver steatosis, splenomegaly and
nephromegaly (abdominal protuberances), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, acromegaloid
habitus, hyperhidrosis
,
and hirsutism
.
Fatty tissue still remains at hand palsm and foot soles, orbits, scalp,
perineum, iuxtaarticular and epidural regions. Pancreas amyloidosis
and extreme insulin resistance => diabetes mellitus,
hypertriglyceridemia
Prognosis : liver
cirrhosis
,
acute
pancreatitis
,
diabetic
nephropathy
-
acquired total lipodystrophy
-
acquired generalized lipodystrophy / Lawrence syndrome
Epidemiology : during childhood or adolescence
Aetiology : after shingles
,
measles
virus
,
Bordetella
pertussis
,
pneumonia
,
osteomyelitis
,
mumps
virus
,
HHV-4
/ EBV
,
hepatitis
Pathogensis : autoimmune disease (juvenile
dermatomyositis
,
juvenile
rheumatoid arthritis
,
Hashimoto's
disease
,
autoimmune
hemolytic anemia
,
autoimmune
hepatitis
,
vitiligo
)
with anti-adipocyte antibodies
Symptoms & signs : acute
panniculitis
=> mild hirsutism
,
acanthosis
nigricans
(33%), liver steatosis
,
diabetes
mellitus. Superficial muscles and veins are accentuated.
-
disseminated necrosis
of adipose tissue
Aetiology :
Pathogenesis : release of pancreatic lipase
into bloodstream
Therapy :
-
PPARg agonists
increase subcutaneous fat mass, but rosiglitazone, at the maximum dose
of 8 mg a day, does not improve fat mass in HIV lipoatrophyref.
-
the effects of leptin
on adipose tissue mass are not reported. Both treatments improve metabolic
variables and reduce the size of the liver. Additionally, leptin reduces
hepatic and intramyocellular lipid content.
-
lipomatosis / liposis : a condition characterized
by abnormal localized, or tumor-like, accumulations of fat in the tissues.
-
lipomatosis atrophicans : localized accumulations of fat in certain
tissues, associated with emaciation of the rest of the body
-
polymicrolipomatosis : lipomatosis marked by the presence in the
subcutaneous tissues of numerous small lipomas.
-
lipomatosis gigantea : a form in which the adipose deposits form
large masses.
Localizations :
-
Shwachman-Diamond
syndrome / congenital lipomatosis of pancreas

-
diffuse lipomatosis / diffuse lipoma : abnormal increase of subcutaneous
fat in the parts above the pelvis, usually in males.
-
nodular circumscribed
lipomatosis : the formation of multiple circumscribed or encapsulated
lipomas which may be distributed symmetrically (multiple symmetrical
lipomatosis (MSL) / Madelung's disease) or haphazardly or which may
form a collar around the neck (Madelung's neck : hump, double chin),
supraclavear region and shoulders. At times they may be painful (lipoma,
or lipomatosis, dolorosa).
Epidemiology : male:female ratio = 4-15
Aetiology : A8344G or G8363A transitions
in mtDNA encoding tRNA lysine (MTTK)
(also peripheral neuropathy
,
myopathy
,
cerebellar
ataxia
,myoclonus
and hearing loss
)
Symptoms & signs : laryngeal, tracheal,
or cava vein compression, accumulations of fat in the neck, shoulders and
other parts of the trunk
Laboratory examinations : high HDL-Ch
-
renal lipomatosis / lipomatosis renis
: fatty masses within the kidney.
-
mediastinic lipomatosis
Aetiology : Cushing
syndrome
Symptoms & signs : tracheal compression
-
pelvic lipomatosis
Symptoms & signs : nycturia, pollakiuria,
dysuria, constipation, abdominal pain in lower quadrants, bilateral ureteral
obstruction
-
epidural lipomatosis in thoracic
or lumbar spine
Symptoms & signs : backache, radicular
pain, or compression or spinal cord