(Abstract). In: Program and abstracts of the 29th Interscience
Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Houston: American
Society for Microbiology, 1989:145). Additionally, an outbreak of invasive
infection due to
S. pneumoniae, including cases of primary septicemia
and meningitis as well as pneumonia, was described in 12 inmates of an
overcrowded jail in Texas in 1989
ref.
All patients were male; their mean age was 30 (range: 19-53) years. 5 additional
inmates with pneumonia had
S. pneumoniae isolated from sputum specimens.
All isolates from the 17 patients were serotype 12. 14 patients had underlying
conditions including alcoholism and intravenous-drug abuse, cirrhosis,
and asplenia. Only one inmate had been previously immunized with pneumococcal
vaccine. More recently, in 1998, an outbreak of multidrug-resistant pneumonia
and bacteremia was described among unvaccinated nursing home residents
ref.
Pneumonia developed in 11 of 84 residents (13%), 3 of whom died. Multidrug-resistant
S.
pneumoniae, serotype 23F, was isolated from blood and sputum from 7
of the 11 residents with pneumonia (64%) and from nasopharyngeal specimens
from 17 of the 74 residents tested (23%) and 2 of the 69 employees tested
(3%). All the serotype 23F isolates were identical according to pulsed-field
gel electrophoresis. Recent use of antibiotics was associated with both
colonization (RR = 2.3; IC
95 = 1.3 to 4.2) and disease (RR =
3.6; IC
95 = 1.2 to 10.8). Only 3 residents (4%) had undergone
pneumococcal vaccination. After residents received pneumococcal vaccine
and prophylactic antibiotics, there were no additional cases of pneumonia,
and the rates of carriage decreased substantially. Additionally, a 1996
outbreak in a NY nursing home was discussed in ProMED
Epidemiology : endemic
in swine in most pig-rearing countries in the world. Human infections are
rare, with < 150 sporadic cases reported in the world literature according
to the UK Health Protection Agency, mainly in countries and regions breeding
pigs and eating pork in Northern Europe and Southern Asia. The 1st-ever
recorded case was in Denmark in 1968. Though endemic in swine, human infections
are rare. And where they have occurred, mortality rates have been <
10%. In past literature, there have been 1 or 2 cases when people died
within 36 hours, but those were exceptions rather than the rule.
-
Germany : a carrier prevalence study was reported to assess the amount
of culture-positive throats among workers in swine slaughterhouses and
processing plants. 7 of 132 workers (5.3%) were found to have positive
throats cultures with no colonization in control individualsref.
-
Thailand usually had < 20 known cases a year.
-
In 1998, 25 cases of Streptococcus suis type 2 infection were reported
in Jiangsu, China -- characterized by toxic shock-like illness or meningitisref.
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2000; 34:150-2). Identical strains were
identified in local swineref.
S.
suis (type not specified) may be the 2nd most common cause of adult
streptococcal meningitis in Thailand. Single hospitals reviewed 8 (1993
to 1999)ref,
10 and 12 cases (1997 to 2002). Associated skin and soft tissue infections
were commonref.
25 cases were treated in 2 hospitals in Hong Kong during 1984 to 1993ref.
30 cases of S. suis meningitis were reported in the Netherlands
during 1968 to 1984ref.
Additional cases have been reported in Greeceref,
Spainref,
Japan (S. suis type 2)ref,
Croatia (S. suis type 1) (Kopi J, Paradzik MT, Pandak N: [Streptococcus
suis infection, a zoonosis we should have in mind--2 case reports]. Lijec
Vjesn 2003; 125:134-7), Taiwanref,
Singaporeref,
the United Kingdomref,
Austriaref,
Belgiumref,
Canadaref,
Italyref,
New Zealandref,
Swedenref,
and Latin Americaref.
Cases in Germanyref,
Netherlandsref
and Franceref
have been acquired from wild boar. Occupational seropositivity has been
documented in New Zealandref
and the Netherlandsref.
S.
suis infection is found in all pig-raising countries, worldwide. Pigs
develop meningitis, arthritis, pneumonia, septicemia, endocarditis, encephalitis,
polyserositis, and abscesses. The disease is not considered to be highly
infectious, and most outbreaks are limited to the affected farms. Pig infection
is not notifiable on the national or international level. Affected farms
may suffer economic loss. Vaccination and antibiotic therapy in pigs have
been used with varying success. The rarity of human disease to date suggests
that the outbreak in China is due to a new strain of the bacterium. Clinical
features of S. suis type 2 infection in these case reports have
included high fever, malaise, nausea and vomiting -- followed by meningitis,
subcutaneous hemorrhage, multi-organ failure (hepatic, renal, pulmonary,
cardiac) and coma in severe cases. Deafness is common. Individual
reports of peritonitis, endocarditis, rhabdomyolysis, spondylodiscitis
,
sacroilitis, monoarthritis, endophthalmitis
and cranial nerve palsy are documented. Virtually all patients have been
farmers and butchers, of whom 80% were men. Most had been involved in butchering
sick pigs or selling the pork. > 40% of the patients were in the age group
50 to 60 years, and none were children.
-
China : the last outbreak of Streptococcus suis in China was in
1998 (Jiangsu province), and involved 22 people causing 14 deaths. But
in 2005, ...
-
in China's western Sichuan province between 24 Jun and 30
Jul 2005 204 farmers (44 laboratory-confirmed, 131 diagnosed at a clinic,
and 39 suspected) (80% males, > 40% aged between 50 and 60 years) from
108 villages of 40 different townships in 11 cities/prefectures (first
in Ziyang (414 pigs affected and 2899 destroyed since 25 Jun) and
its neighboring city of Neijiang (193 pigs affected and 3159 destroyed
since 15 Jul), then Jianyang (9 pigs affected and 583 destroyed
since 17 Jul), Zigong, Suining, Deyang (5 pigs affected
since 29 Jul : 66 destroyed), Luzhou (2 pigs affected since 12 Jul
: 7 destroyed), Mianyang (1 pig destroyed on 24 Jul),
Nanchong
(2 pigs affected and destroyed since 29 Jul), Yibin, Leshan,
and the provincial capital
Chengdu (15 pigs affected since 2 Aug
: 19 destroyed)), were admitted to hospital with high fever, fatigue, nausea,
and vomiting and became comatose later with bruises under the skin. The
area has a population of 7 million, in a 100-km (62-mile) belt stretching
from the cities of Ziyang to Neijiang. From 24 Jun through 21 Jul 2005,
the authorities reported 20 cases of illness of unknown cause admitted
to 3 hospitals in that city. WHO was officially informed of the outbreak
on 22 Jul 2005, at which time, 20 cases and 9 deaths had been reported.
By 22 Aug 2005, 40 patients had died, 58 had been discharged from
hospital, 117 are in hospita, with 12 still in a critical condition. They
all butchered sick pigs or sheep before coming down with the strange disease,
but the detected cases are not interrelated and no infection has been found
in any close contact of the patients. There have been 36 counties (districts),
132 towns (streets), and 202 villages (community offices) infected in areas.
> 450 pigs infected with Streptococcus suis were burned in the area.
50 checkpoints are in place to prevent swine from being moved around. No
new cases have been reported since 5 Aug 2005. The data provided by China
depict an outbreak that peaked from the 2nd through the 4th week of Jul
2005, and dwindled rapidly thereafter
Transfer to humans is rare -- which makes the Sichuan mortality rate
alarming. In addition, this province is China's largest pig center, producing
> 50 million swine annually. S.suis
type 2 (B) was identified
in 5 patients on 26 Jul. One differential diagnosis was
CCHF
,
first reported in China in 1964, and is known locally as Xinjiang hemorrhagic
fever. Cases are reported from the south west region. 260 cases (54 fatal)
were reported in Xinjiang (southern desert region) during 1964 to 1995.
10 to 20% of sheep, goats, and cattle in Sichuan are seropositive. This
latter information raises the index of suspicion that CCHF is a likely
candidate. While CCHF is usually thought of as a tickborne disease, it
can also be transmitted through contact with infected bodily fluids from
people (in nosocomial outbreaks) and animals. Another of the hemorrhagic
fevers seen in the region is hemorrhagic renal syndrome associated with
hantavirus infection. The description above makes that diagnosis less likely,
although one must recognize that newswire descriptions may not necessarily
be representative of the actual clinical picture. Some of the features
of these illnesses are not characteristic of avian influenza; in particular,
the unrelatedness of the victims, the development of hemorrhagic symptoms
and shock, and the association with slaughter of pigs and sheep. The one
caution towards that being the diagnosis is the lack of mention of that
in the press articles, as one would expect that specimens have been sent
for testing of previously known hemorrhagic fever organisms. Virtually
all infection diseases begin with "flu-like" symptoms and this cannot be
taken as indicative of avian influenza virus infection. Furthermore the
role of pigs as a mixing vessel allowing interactions between human and
avian influenza viruses is an attractive hypothesis, but one that has still
to be substantiated. As of April, 23% of 450 Chinese pigs tested were carrying
a less virulent avian flu strain : H9N2. If it is
the case that the porcine streptococcus is the cause of these illnesses,
perhaps the organism has acquired one or more virulence factors (from,
for instance, the Group A streptococcus or Staphylococcus aureus)
to increase its transmissibility and virulence in humans. It would be interesting
to assess any medical co-morbidities in the infected cohort. The authorities
have dismissed speculation that the deaths were caused by bird flu, a virus
that has killed over 50 people in Asia since late 2003. Nevertheless, medical
experts outside mainland China said the unusually high mortality rate of
20% and reports that many of the 27 victims died within a day of showing
symptoms were inconsistent with what is known so far about human Streptococcus
suis infection.
The deaths in China are very unusual. Many patients in Sichuan were
bleeding under the skin, a symptom that has been cited in only 2 or 3 cases
in medical literature on the bacteria. According to experts with the team
sent by the Ministry of Agriculture to the area of the outbreak, the vaccines
for Streptococcus suis type II, a bacterium carried by pigs, will
soon be batch-produced in south China's Guangdong Province and are expected
to reach Sichuan Province in about 1 week after being inspected by the
Ministry of Agriculture. Yongshun biomedical company in Guangdong will
be the first to mass-produce the vaccines. The Chinese government responded
on Sun 31 Aug 2005 by airlifting the 1st batch of a vaccine for the infection
-- enough to treat 360 000 pigs -- from the southern city of Guangzhou
to the affected towns. The vaccine's manufacturers will be producing enough
vaccine to treat 10 million pigs in the coming days, but vaccines take
3 weeks to produce immunity in the pigsref.
It is plausible that the organism (and possibly toxin) load to which the
patients were exposed was higher if the swine had been dug up after being
buried, with the possibility of further S. suis replication and
toxin production while buried. This could explain the different disease
observations, which have caused observers to be somewhat unsure if the
S.
suis is indeed the etiology. From the perspective of a researcher in
human streptococcal infection, this emergence of Streptococcus suis
infection in humans resembles the outbreaks of group B streptococcal infection
that emerged in human neonates during the 1970s and then in debilitated
adults in the 1980s. Both instances remain unexplained. Indeed, S. suisresembles
group B streptococcus (S. agalactiae) in many respects. Both are
encapsulated hemolytic streptococci that have propensity to cause bacteremia
and meningitis in newborns after exposure to the organism in vaginal secretions.
Most newborns remain asymptomatically colonized but in a minority progress
serious infection including sepsis, meningitis, pneumonia and localized
infections. Both organisms remain susceptible to beta-lactam antibiotics
and, in humans, control of the infection has been largely achieved by use
of antibiotic prophylaxis of maternal carriers of group B strep. during
childbirth. Diagnosis of S. suis infection in both pigs and humans
is based upon culture of the organism from normally sterile sites and should
not be difficult. Clinical details from the current outbreak (both from
the pigs and the humans) are thus far lacking and it is therefore difficult
to assess whether some co-infection (or other co-morbidity) may be accounting
for this unprecedented cluster of human disease.
Inspectors swooped down on the unregistered abattoir in the city of
Gongzhuling in Jilin province in the 1st week August 2005, and found it
had been supplying meat to a sausage factory in the provincial capital,
Changchun, which had also been shut down. Inspectors found 6 to 8 tons
of pork in the underground slaughterhouse, and our tests showed at least
one ton came from pigs who had died of illnessref.
Several aspects of the current outbreak still remain unanswered. What are
the morbidity and mortality rates in pigs? Is there any differential age
susceptibility? What are the pathological and histopathological changes?
Are there any performed/envisaged virological investigations besides excluding
influenza and Nipah? Have there been any experimental infection trials
in animals? All these unanswered questions cloud the perception of transparency
in disease reporting. At this point, might it not be useful to have
an international presence on outbreak swine farms so that some of these
questions can be answered sooner rather than later? Applying "stamping
out" is an unusually severe measure when related to a bacterium which --
at least, according to existing knowledge -- is rather endemic in many
countries in piggeries. It would be helpful to note how screening is to
be applied, and what criteria will be used for farms to be "stamped out."
A circular has been issued by the Sichuan Provincial Propaganda Department...which
forbids local press from sending reporters to the infected areas or hospitals.
No amendments of Xinhua reports are allowed, including the headline: Xinhua's
is currently the only version of events available to both Chinese and overseas
reporters alike. Please note that S. suis does not spread from person-to-person.
The symptoms of the disease have led some experts to speculate that Ebola
virus could be the cause : the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has prohibited
news coverage, and has forbidden the use of the words ‘Ebola virus’ in
reports, instead requiring the use of alternate wording. Doctor Wang (?)
said that the virus sample specimen was examined as soon as it was received
and a type of Ebola virus was extracted from the specimen. When asked why
“low dissemination” was added to the name of the Ebola virus in China,
Doctor Wang explained that it was done to reduce public concern, and also
because a variation of the Ebola virus had actually occurred in China.
They started the examination quickly after receiving the sample, they extracted
SZ77++A3231
virus from the sample, which is a kind of Ebola virus. The previous
classification of Ebola in the country used the EBO – location (where it
was discovered) – model; later on, for unknown reasons, the news of classification
leaked out. Therefore the classification method changed, they abandoned
EBO, increasing the infection extent, infection speed, etc. The disease
that occurred at the beginning of June is SZ77++A3231 virus, sometimes
we do not specify the source region but directly use ++A3231, so that people
will not think of the Ebola virus.” The CCP formed 3 departments specifically
to conduct these examinations, so obviously Sichuan is not the only area
to have experienced the illness caused by the Ebola virus. Many Mainland
Chinese recognize that the current mystery disease in Sichuan is the EB-SZ77
type Ebola virus. The earliest occurrence of this Ebola virus disease can
be traced back to Shenzhen city in Guangdong Province. On March 25, 2005,
The
Epoch Times published an article on the first appearance of the Ebola
virus in Shenzhen during February. The virus had already caused
several deaths and cases of ‘missing people’ [Editor’s note: rather than
accurately reporting the cause of death, the authorities simply claim that
victims are ‘missing’]. This article mentioned that medical personnel who
had been working in hospitals for years said that they had never seen an
illness like it. The bodies of those who died of the illness appeared to
be dissolved, much like the Ebola virus in Africa. The main spread of the
virus was through blood, causing doctors to die after contact with infected
blood. On March 26, Shenzhen Customs and related hospitals and government
departments held a confidential meeting to pass an order from higher authorities
to strengthen the hygiene-related work. An insider also disclosed that
at dawn on March 26, another suspected Ebola virus death case occurred
in Nanao Town, Shenzhen. There are indications that the Ebola virus was
already spreading in Mainland China. The CCP blocked this information,
telling the outside world that the deaths were caused by the advanced stages
of AIDS. On March 29, China’s Ministry of Health announced that, “Presently,
this virus has not been found in the mainland.” The source of the information
regarding the death case in Nanao Town couldn’t be contacted further, and
the company and hospitals denied the existence of the Nanao Town case or
any existence of a patient record. All websites in mainland China have
now started using official language to report this case. Although the Ministry
of Health said that Ebola virus has not been found on the mainland, according
to inside information on July 14, frequent confidential meetings were held
by the Guangdong Province government, Guangzhou military region, Shenzhen
municipal government and Shenzhen Customs during late June and early July,
discussing the slow spread of the Ebola virus in Guangdong Province. People
were strictly prohibited from spreading information about the Ebola virus
and bird flu that appeared in Guangdong and media reports were also forbidden.
Why don’t CCP officials allow the WHO to investigate and provide help?
Veterinary pathology scholar Liu Zhenyi said that the CCP has always flaunted
its “greatness, honor, and correctness”, and is most concerned about saving
face. This appears to be a higher priority than people’s lives. Guan Yi,
scholar and bird flu expert at Hong Kong University disclosed in Nature
magazine that bird flu had infected southern China. Chinese officials subsequently
shut down his laboratory, slandered him and said that his laboratory was
“illegal.” Doctor Wang, quoted earlier, who examined this strange Sichuan
disease, also believes that the CCP would not allow the involvement of
the WHO because it would be extremely disadvantageous for the international
image of the CCP. It wouldn’t be just a medical question, but could lead
to exposure on issues such as the local medical environment, survival conditions,
environmental pollution and political corruptionref.
A total of 647 pigs have died as a result of Streptococcus suis
infection in Sichuan province. The deaths occurred in 149 villages of 88
municipalities in 21 counties of the following 8 regions: Chengdu, Deyang,
Luzhou, Mianyang, Nanchong, Neijiang, Zigong, Ziyang. The epizootic began
in late June 2005, reached a peak around 20 Jul, and then declined sharply.
No new cases have occurred since 6 August 2005. This epizootic was caused
by Streptococcus suis type 2. The LD50 (dose lethal to
50% of the animals) of the bacterial strain isolated in Sichuan was determined
using the new laboratory animal model, zebra fish (pure breeding line),
and the virulence genes of the bacterium were also tested. The results
of the tests showed that the virulence of the isolate is not significantly
different from that of isolates obtained from other places in the past,
and no evidence of genetic variation has been found. The main characteristics
of the epizootic were as follows:
-
1.1. Spatial distribution : the outbreak areas were mainly centralised
in the historical endemic areas of S. suis infection in Ziyang,
Neijiang, and other places. The outbreaks occurred sporadically, and did
not occur densely over a large region. Infected points were far apart and
had no direct epidemiological relationship. There is therefore little likelihood
of transmission having occurred between them.
-
1.2. Temporal distribution : the disease was first recognised on 24 Jun
2005, and mainly occurred in July. During this period the weather was hot,
humid and rainy. The season when the epizootic occurred was the same as
in the past. This shows that the occurrence of S. suis infection
in pigs is specific to a particular season.
-
1.3. Herd distribution : all outbreaks occurred in remote rural areas with
poor economic conditions, and only in small backyard farms, where animal
health conditions are poor, and pigpens are dimly lit, damp and inadequately
ventilated. No outbreaks were reported in intensive farms and large-scale
premises with better sanitary conditions. The morbidity observed in pigs
within each affected group was low.
-
2. Control measures : the recent S. suis epizootic was effectively
controlled by applying all of the following measures:
-
- preventive treatment of pigs in the same herd as infected and dead animals
using highly sensitive antimicrobials, and improvement of resistance to
the disease by adding preventive medicine to animal feed;
-
- regular disinfection of swine holdings in infected places and zones,
livestock markets and designated slaughterhouses, aimed at improving sanitary
conditions;
-
- destruction of cadavers of dead pigs by deep burial;
-
- stepping up of inspection and quarantine, and movement control of animals
and animal products;
-
- development and production of vaccine, and emergency vaccination of pigs
in high-risk areas aimed at improving their level of immunity.
-
3. Vaccination : pigs have been vaccinated with Streptococcus suis
type 2 vaccine.
In the regions of Ziyang, Neijiang and Zigong, where highest morbidity
was found, vaccination was performed in all counties; in the other 5 regions,
vaccination was performed only in the infected counties and in the zones
at risk adjacent to infected zones. No vaccination was performed in pigs
for slaughter within 20 days, one month old piglets, pregnant sows, or
weak pigs. To date, about 14 million pigs have been vaccinated, and the
vaccination cover is up to 90%. Testing of vaccinated pigs with indirect
ELISA showed that 70% of pigs had a significant serum antibody titre 14
days after vaccination. The application of vaccine in the field has demonstrated
that Streptococcus suis type 2 inactivated vaccine is effective,
safe and has few side effects. While this report indicates all swine cases
were confined to 647 cases in Sichuan province, there appear to have been
human cases in Hong Kong. In fact, the disease is recognized, rarely in
ig-producing areas worldwideref
-
in Jiangsu province (in eastern China and not at all geographically
close to Sichuan) : the 1st man (a butcher) to fall ill was admitted to
the hospital of Suzhou with a high fever on 28 Jul 2005 and died on 2 Aug
2005. The 2nd case (a meat seller) was hospitalized on 2 Aug 2005 and died
a few days later. In the summer of 1998 (Jul and Aug), an epidemic of deadly
S.
suis infection struck people in Jiangsu, resulting in 14 deaths and
> 80 000 dead pigs. The epidemiological investigation and clinical description
(including diagnosis, microbiological confirmation and treatment) of the
epidemic were well-reported in Chinese medical journals. The epidemiologic
link of the victims to dead or diseased pigs is similar to that in the
recent outbreak in Sichuan, and cases were sporadic in occurrence and scattered
in geographic distribution. No point-source outbreak or human-to-human
transmission was documented. In one of the reports, 25 persons were affected
and 14 died (overall mortality rate 56%). 13 out of 16 persons who developed
streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS) died (crude mortality rate 81%).
Of the 9 persons who developed streptococcal meningitis, only 1 died (crude
mortality rate 11%). The clinical picture is similar to that reported recently
in Sichuan, except that the Sichuan cases are now classified into 4 categories,
(1) ordinary type (milder febrile illness with no shock or meningitis),
(2) STSS (with high mortality), (3) meningitis (with high incidence of
sensorineural deafness), and (4) mixed type (with both STSS and meningitis,
and with high mortality). The culprit was confirmed to be S. suis
serotype 2, the same as that which caused the recent Sichuan outbreak.
The epidemiologic links are the same as those
identified in Sichuan. Thus, the disease occurring in epidemic proportion
is not new in China, but may be new in the English or world medical literature.
One thing that is not clear up to this moment is the extent of swine deaths
in Sichuan. In an official news report dated 5 Aug 2005, only 644 pigs
were reported to have been killed by the deadly bacterium in Sichuan as
of 4 Aug 2005. Readers may be interested to look up some of the Chinese
publications (with English abstracts) on the Jiangsu outbreak:
-
Zhang X, Ding J, Qin H: Clinical analysis of 22 cases of the disease contracted
both by man and pigs with swine streptococcus infections. Journal of Tropical
Medicine 2002; 2:361-3, 372.
-
Ying H, Zhu F, Shi Z, et al: Isolation and identification of streptococcus
suis. Jiangsu Preventive Medicine 2001; 12:9-10.
-
Tang J, Zhu J, Guo H, et al: Epidemiological and pathogenic study on the
outbreak of toxic shock syndrome and meningocephalitis caused by swine
streptococcus. Acta Academiae Medicinae Militaris Tertiae 2001; 23:1292-5.
-
Yang H, Zhu F, Shi Z, et al: Analysis on pathogenic feature of syndrome
infected by S. suis from human and swine. Chinese Journal of Zoonoses 2001;
17:92-3, 120.
-
You Y, Shen J: The epidemiological study on human streptococcal infections
syndrome caused by infected pigs. Chinese Primary Health Care 2001; 15:20-1.
-
Zhu J, Tang J, Zhang Y, et al: Biological characters and identification
of the pathogen contributing to the outbreaking epidemic toxic shock like
syndrome. Chin J Infect Dis 2001; 19:84-6.
-
Zhu F, Yang H, Hu X, et al: Homogeneity study on the Streptococcus suis
isolated from human and swine. Chin J Epidemiol 2000;21(6):427-9.
-
Zhu J, Tang J, Guo H, et al. Epidemiologic and pathogenic study on an outbreak
of acute streptococcal disease in pigs. J Prev Med Chin PLA 2000; 18:257-60.
-
Hu X, Zhu F, Wang H, et al Studies on human streptococcal infectious syndrome
caused by infected pigs. Chin J Prev Med 2000; 34:150-2.
-
Wang H, Hu X, Zhu F, et al: A epidemiological study on the human streptococcal
infective syndrome among men and pigs. Modern Preventive Medicine 2000;
27:312-4.
-
in Guangdong province, which borders Hong Kong and is hundreds of
miles southeast of Sichuan, 4 cases and 1 death occurred, including
:
-
a 43-year-old slaughterhouse worker in Chaozhou was affected on Jul 31
through a wound on his hand as he slaughtered a sick pig: he recovered
and was discharged. Investigators suggest the infected pigs came from 300
small farms with poor sanitary conditions.
-
a man who has slaughtered pigs from Yangjiang town died
-
Chao'an County
-
Nanxiong city
-
Shenzhen city
No pigs were reported sickened by S. suis, the bacteria blamed for
the human cases
-
in Hong Kong : in Kay's paper published in 1995ref,
the authors mention a "small outbreak" of 38 cases between 1981 and 1983.
These cases, indeed most cases including the cases occurring now, tend
to present in the summer months. The 1981-83 cases appear to have occurred
following the importation of "10 000 live pigs per day from neighboring
China in hot and crowded conditions." Small clusters, therefore,
appear to have occurred before but not to this degree and generally linked
to meningitis due to this organism (Chau PY, Huang CY, Kay R: Streptococcus
suis meningitis: an important underdiagnosed disease in Hong Kong.
Med J Aust 1983; 1:414-17). From 1983 to 1994, there were 25 cases of human
Streptococcus
suis infections in Hong Kong. In 1983, it was shown that the virus
was the leading cause of meningitis in Hong Kongref
: in 2005 there were 12 cases including 2 deaths (4 since the outbreak
in China was 1st reported in June 2005; related to the Sichuan outbreak
? a 26-year-old interior decorator who has not traveled to the mainland
recently and has had no contact with pigs was admitted to hospital 5 Jul
2005 and discharged a week later; a 78-year-old woman resident of Mong
Kok who had not left Hong Kong came down with the infection on 3 Aug 2005
and was admitted to Kwong Wah Hospital in Mong Kok with a fever and pain
in her right hip on 8 Aug 2005; a 44-year-old butcher working at Wellcome
Supermarket admitted to the hospital on Tue 16 Aug 2005 with fever and
pain in his finger and left thigh and is now in stable condition; a 79-year-old
woman resident at Kowloon City developed fever, right knee pain, redness
and swelling on 16 Aug 2005, was admitted to Queen Elizabeth Hospital and
confirmed on Mon, 22 Aug 2005; A 62-year-old woman; a 43-year-old, who
had no
recent travel history, was admitted to the hospital and immediately
died on 13 Oct 2005). Pork contaminated with this organism was found worldwide
and as much as 50% of pork imported from Holland, New Zealand and Australia
bore the bacterium. So far in 2005, Hong Kong has imported > 18,000 tons
of frozen pork from Sichuan, of which 5000 tons came from the 2 most affected
cities -- Ziyang and Neijiang. On Mon 1 Aug 2005, the Hong Kong authorities
said that, to better monitor the situation, they would classify Streptococcus
suis as a statutorily notifiable disease, which would require all local
doctors to report cases (in humans) to the government. They also stepped
up inspections and quarantine procedures on live pigs and frozen pork imported
from mainland provinces and said they would crack down on illegal pork
importsref.
Pork from Sichuan and Henan provinces, and also Shenzhen, which supplies
> 60% of the frozen and chilled pork to
Hong Kong, will re-enter Hong Kong on Aug 24 for the 1st time since
imports were banned late in Jul 2005. Genetic characterization of the first
9 of the 11 cases known in Hong Kong have shown different bacterial strains,
suggesting the previous cases were sporadic and that there was no link
between them. It would not be surprising if multiple strains of S. suis
are behind the outbreak in Sichuan. If the digging up of dead, infected
pigs (with high titers of different strains of type 2 S. suis in
them) for meat is behind the outbreak rather than evolution of a more virulent,
toxin-producing strain, multiple Sichuan strains should be found in pigs
and man.
Serious infections with Streptococcus suis have been recorded in
the past in China : of the 22 cases, 5 cases which were ordinary type were
cured; 10 cases were meningitis 2 type, 8 of which were cured and 2 of
which improved; an 7 cases were toxicosis shock syndrome (TTS) 2 type ,
none of which was able to avoid death. The total mortality was 31.8%.
At the time the disease was widely epidemic and worsened (Zhang X , Ding
J, & Qin H: Clinical analysis of 22 cases of the disease contracted
both by man and pigs with swine streptococcus Infections. (Chinese) Journal
of Tropical Medicine, 2, 2002; 2:361-63). The abstract implies that an
outbreak of human (and swine) infections occurred but the exact details
of the length of time that the cases were found is not given.
-
USA : a 59-years old man reported in 2006 (occupational exposure)ref
Kay and colleagues
ref
present a cogent discussion on the classification of
S. suis. Based
on analysis of porcine streptococcal strains in the 1950s and 1960s that
were ungroupable using the Lancefield typing sera, serogroups R, S and
T were designated for these porcine strains. The S capsular strain
became referred to as
S. suis type 1 and the R capsular strain as
type 2. Although almost 30 capsular types have been now characterized,
type 2
S. suis remains the most relevant serotype in porcine and
human infection.
Transmission : reservoir :
Sus
scrofa
(occupational disease expecially in breeders and slaughterers). The organism
is carried on the pig's tonsils and is spread pig-to-pig through nose rubbing
or coughing. But it's only found in small concentration on the pigs' tonsils,
so it's difficult for a human to catch it that way. When the infection
spreads to the brain, causing meningitis, it's in far greater concentration,
and so it can be transmitted to humans who eat raw infected pork or handle
the dead animal with open cuts. Although the governmental official states
that risk of infection is only present with open wounds, Kay's study
ref
reported that only 20% of patients were noted to have sustained minor cuts
or burns before symptoms occurred. Finding that many patients had no history
of any injury, the authors speculate that respiratory or oral routes may
be important.
=> a wide range of infections in pigs, including meningitis, arthritis,
pneumonia, septicemia, endocarditis, encephalitis, polyserositis, and abscesses.
The bacterium is endemic in all pig-raising countries world-wide, especially
affecting large, intensively managed pig farms. The disease is not regarded
to be highly infectious, most outbreaks are limited to the affected farms,
and is not notifiable, nationally or internationally. Nevertheless, in
the affected farms, significant economic losses may be observed, and, since
antibiotic therapy gives unsatisfactory results, vaccines have been developed
and widely used. The results of vaccination have been inconsistent.
Human infection may occur, but it has generally been known as occupational,
affecting farmers and personnel engaged with pig breeding and their handling,
including slaughter, not a food-borne disease. The current spread of
Streptococcus
suis in China seems odd. Something must be perturbing the usual epidemiology
of this occupational infection. There may be several guesses (and I emphasize
guesses at this point) based on the rereading of the reports:
-
1) The disease is being spread by the foodborne route, and, therefore,
is being transported to markets at substantial distances. This would probably
be associated with some clinical outbreak in swine in Sichuan, while sick
pigs -- instead of being presented for slaughter -- are sold on the open
market at heavily discounted prices. As knowledge of the outbreak in people
dries up the local market, unscrupulous dealers would send the meat further
afield, thus explaining the new cities involved. The farmer eating his
own sick pig falls in this category as well. The articles above, and many
others, refer incorrectly to this disease as swine flu. Swine influenza
is a well known disease but it caused by the influenza virus, not Streptococcus
suis.
-
2) There might be a co-infection with a virus that weakens certain human
immune systems in the outbreak area and, therefore, allows opportunistic
Streptococcus
suis infection. What virus can only be speculated.
-
3) There might be a synergism between 2 pathogens, say a virus and Streptococcus
suis . If the latter was occult and widespread in a latent form, it
is just adding a match to tinder.
-
4) The old epidemiological adage: seek and ye shall find. This is more
applicable to the newer cases and rather doubtful if representing the explanation
for the outbreak in Sichuan.
Unfortunately, there is little information on the swine populations in
Sichuan, because one key factor in putting together the cause of the outbreak
would be to know the status of local swine farms where the cases are occurring.
There is little information, other than bans on pork, coming from the animal
side, but unless there is evidence of an outbreak in pigs indicating a
new, more virulent strain, occupational exposure to normal
Streptococcus
suis could hardly explain the magnitude of the cases in humans generated
this far.
Additionally, the organism could have acquired a toxin or some other
factor, increasing its virulence. To date, it has not clearly been spread
from human to human, and the speculation of an analogy to pneumonic plague
and its transmissibility is just that. Short latent period and multi-organ
failure are ultimate causes for the higher-than-expected mortality rate
of the pig-borne disease : most patients suffered failures in the kidneys,
livers, lungs and heart shortly after they were contracted, and some of
them died before timely treatment. The latent period of the disease is
so short that some patients died
within 10 hours after infection : in one case, a man died 2 hours after
slaughtering a sick pig. In comparison, it normally takes a week or 2 for
an ordinary bacterial infection to break out. On the other hand, the disease
was caused by
Streptococcus suis type 2, the deadliest of all the
35 forms of pig-borne
S. suis bacteria. These are different capsular
types of
S. suis. Type 2 has always represented the most virulent
type in both swine and humans. 2 bacterial pathogens come immediately to
mind that may have a short time, in hours not days, from inoculation and
onset of infection. Both Group A streptococcal and
Pasteurella multocida
(the latter usually associated with feline bites) wound infections can
occur within hours of exposure, but the rapidity of onset does not necessarily
correlate with severity or fulminating infection. Such rapidly fulminating
infections can be seen in pneumococcal (
S. pneumoniae) postsplenectomy
infection and in meningococcemia. Marcelo Gottschalk, one of the world's
leading experts on the disease, works at the world's only reference laboratory
for
S.
suis at the University of Montreal in Canada. Some farmers in
Hong Kong and the mainland "vaccinate" by feeding the tissue of sick pigs
to healthy pigs, according to the chairman of the Hong Kong Pig Farm Association,
Wong Kwong-wing. On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, he said these practices could lead
to mutations of bacteria. Gottschalk warned that homemade vaccination is
"extremely dangerous" because, instead of preventing the disease, healthy
pigs may get infected by the live bacteria which could lead to a serious
outbreak. While Wong said the overuse of antibiotics on pig farms is common
and could be a factor in the outbreak, Gottschalk said this isn't likely.
Overusing antibiotics could increase the resistance of bacteria, he said,
but he doesn't think this carries a greater threat since antibiotics still
kill bacteria like
Streptococcus suis easily.
=> severe flu-like symptoms (such as fever and nausea ) =>
septicemia
and
streptococcal toxic shock-like syndrome (STSS / STSLS)ref
=>
fulminant sepsis
,
meningitis
followed by partial or permanent hearing loss),
endocarditis
,
and a hemorrhagic diathesis can be associated with many bacteremic syndromes
Laboratory examinations : multiple PCR
gives results in 4 hours
Therapy : although a substantial case
fatality rate has been recognized so far, if the mechanism of pathogenesis
here is elaboration of toxins, it is likely that antimicrobials would not
be as useful in established cases. In a 2002 report
ref,
110 strains of
S. suis from swine in France and 25 strains of the
organism from humans (in different countries of origin) were assessed for
antimicrobial sensitivity. Macrolide and tetracycline resistance
was found in some strains, especially serotype 2, but the beta-lactam class
antimicrobial agents were active. Of note, among porcine isolates, there
was no correlation between antimicrobial resistance and virulence.
Prevention : I am not aware of any trials
using a
S. suis type 2 vaccine in humans. Several approaches have
been used in swine, however, including sonicated organisms
ref,
a non-encapsulated mutant
ref,
and
suilysin, the thiol-activated haemolysin
ref.